The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 16, 2005, 07:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by AtlUmpSteve
Mike, at the National UIC Clinic in OKC, Walt Sparks addressed this in the breakout session on obstruction. Frankly, I believe he misspoke several times, and many people left the session totally confused. In the session I attended, we challenged one play, and he reconsidered and reversed himself; but that wasn't the first breakout.

I wouldn't be surprised if Bob Mauger heard it (or thought he heard it) there; but you and I know from Mobile that isn't the rule. A subsequent play must be on a different runner; this play is a continuing play on the same runner.
Thanks, Steve.

I don't remember hearing that. I was out of snyc with the rest of the UICs on the breakout schedule, so I probably missed Walter make that statement.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1