The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Your call was correct as I understand the "errant throw" exception.

"Errant throw" in this situation means a throw that is not caught so the return attempt to make the play is coming from 1st base foul territory.

It is not intended to give the defense a larger base for making the "stretch" for the catch.

I wish ASA would put this interp in writing instead of the current situation of coming from the NUS.
It is.

Quote:
8.2.M.3. On any force out attempt from the foul side of first base, or an errant throw PULLING THE DEFENSE OFF THE BASE INTO FOUL GROUND, the defense and the batter-runner can use either the white or colored portion.
In the scenario given, the throw was neither errant or did it pull F1 off the base into foul ground.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1