View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 05:46pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Your call was correct as I understand the "errant throw" exception.

"Errant throw" in this situation means a throw that is not caught so the return attempt to make the play is coming from 1st base foul territory.

It is not intended to give the defense a larger base for making the "stretch" for the catch.

I wish ASA would put this interp in writing instead of the current situation of coming from the NUS.
It is.

Quote:
8.2.M.3. On any force out attempt from the foul side of first base, or an errant throw PULLING THE DEFENSE OFF THE BASE INTO FOUL GROUND, the defense and the batter-runner can use either the white or colored portion.
In the scenario given, the throw was neither errant or did it pull F1 off the base into foul ground.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote