![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
But only that individual coach has lost the right to file a legal protest. Nobody is taking away the team's right to protest a misapplied rule.. but that is going to have to happen AFTER the offending coach departs. If, after all the hullabaloo, the assistant is not up to speed or whatever on the situation or does not know how to properly go the the motions to do the protest on the feild and his/her team suffers for it; well; thems the breaks! Head coach should have kept his/her head! Not fair? I think it is. The USC by the coach cost them the coach; the loss of the coach's knowlege/skill etc in coaching (i.e. recognizing a potential protestable situation and knowing how to go about protesting) is lost at the same time. No different from a star player getting tossed.. sure a sub can come in and play but the team is going to lose the starter's talent for the remainder of the game. What it all comes down to is that players and coaches are required to conduct themselves properly on the feild ALL THE TIME. There seems to be this theory out there that if the player or coach thinks the official is wrong then all bets are off and it is ok to be a butthead about it. Sorry, not the way it works. I probably come off sounding like a real hard *** Blue who puts a notch on his indicator everytime I run someone.. and really I am not. Most of the time I am probably, if anything, too freindly and good natured as a Blue. I appreciate what the coaches do for the game especially in youth ball. Without them, I don't have a game to call! "Play Ball!" Ernie Anchorage, AK ASA/NFHS |
Bookmarks |
|
|