![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Well, this is one area when my playing years take hold and completely disagree with waiting on help with active runners. Whether offense or defense, as a player, I want a call and I want it now. I understand if an umpire is blocked out, but not if they see a play. I'm not going to worry about a pulled foot, a possible missed tag or a marginal 3' lane violation until I need to worry about it. I can correct those situations with relative ease. The scenario offered worked well because the runner was not a threat to move. However, the same play with multiple runners moving, while the BU is waiting on a decision, assuming there is one to be had, can lead to a multitude of problems just due to the hesitation. It is my personal belief that this train of thought derives from baseball. I have often had discussions, sometimes heated, with the little ball guys that an umpire should NEVER, NEVER change a call once made, including an appeal on a pulled foot or a missed tag, missed base. Also, I don't think the priority on the call at first is as important as I am reading in Steve M's post unless it was the sole play. I would think that, especially at the collegiate level, a coach is going to be more concerned over a missed call at any other base before one at 1B as the closer a runner gets to home, the more important their survival and the umpires call becomes. I know it doesn't agree with most, but it is just my personal opinion,
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|