Talking Mechanics

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by Manny A

As he mentioned in the article, Jay's talking about getting a new ball fresh out of a box or plastic wrapper. It happens sometimes when the three or four balls we get from the home team end up not being available. He recommends not grabbing a handful of dirt and rubbing it directly onto the ball, since we don't allow players to do that. His suggestion is to transfer dirt onto the ball by rolling it on the ground or sprinkling dirt onto it while it's laying there, then rubbing the dirt off of it, which should help get the shine off the ball.

Grab a handful of dirt and... rub it on the ball (illegal), put the ball on the ground and sprinkle it on the ball and then rub (legal)... That's just silly, IMO.

Originally Posted by Manny A

Whoever edits the softball articles in Referee really needs to look at things from a softball perspective. In Jay's article, her refers to the "rubber" instead of the pitcher's plate, and talks of holding up the pitcher by raising the right hand with palm facing her. Those are dead giveaways that he's not a polished softball umpire instructor.

You expect this level of effort from the magazine that officially stopped any coverage of softball officiating because it was not a "major" sport? (Yeah, I carry a grudge a LONG time!)

[Manny A]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Grab a handful of dirt and... rub it on the ball (illegal), put the ball on the ground and sprinkle it on the ball and then rub (legal)... That's just silly, IMO.

He never said it was illegal for an umpire to grab a handful of dirt and rub it on the ball. Hell, I do that all the time, and never really thought of it as an issue. He just suggested not to do it, and it was my speculation that the reason behind it had to do with it being illegal for a player to do it, so he came up with an alternative way of doing it. Yeah, maybe it is silly, but it's not quite as obvious, I suppose.

[CecilOne]

Post above:
2 - I don't have catcher in my way if in proper slot with heel-toe, unless she shifts into slot.

I didn't see any reference to that in the article. Jay said that sometimes the batter may initially restrict the umpire's view, but his/her view will open up when the batter gets into her hitting-position crouch.
----------------------------

He said something about looking through the catcher if chin below her helmet.
My point is in the proper heel-toe, fully in slot; I barely see the catcher let alone look "through" her.

[Skahtboi]

I'll be honest. Years ago I learned that I call a more consistent strike zone by setting up exactly the same on every batter. My head drops no lower than the extended throat protector on my mask being about the height of the catcher's helmet. I look down and into the strike zone, rather than framing myself with it.

Sort of the philosophy of the Gerry Davis stance applied to the heel/toe stance. Mentally, my strike zone adjusts with each batter, yet physically I remain the same. I realize that this is not for everyone, but it seems to work well for me.

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by CecilOne

Post above:
2 - I don't have catcher in my way if in proper slot with heel-toe, unless she shifts into slot.

I didn't see any reference to that in the article. Jay said that sometimes the batter may initially restrict the umpire's view, but his/her view will open up when the batter gets into her hitting-position crouch.
----------------------------

He said something about looking through the catcher if chin below her helmet.
My point is in the proper heel-toe, fully in slot; I barely see the catcher let alone look "through" her.

I experimented with the chin-to-helmet today and could not see all of the zone; especially as the batters height varied and the catcher came up for a high pitch or runner.