The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9
Legal pitch?

Fed rule set. Pitcher places her pivot foot heel on the plate, non-pivot foot toes on the plate. As she starts forward, she moves to the ball of her pivot foot to push off, but the ball of her foot is 3-4 inches in front of the plate due to how she intially placed her feet. That is the position of her feet at the time of release. Even though her intial foot placement is legal, I feel the pitch is illegal since she is pushing off from in front of the plate.

Legal or illegal?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 01:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by kblump View Post
Fed rule set. Pitcher places her pivot foot heel on the plate, non-pivot foot toes on the plate. As she starts forward, she moves to the ball of her pivot foot to push off, but the ball of her foot is 3-4 inches in front of the plate due to how she intially placed her feet. That is the position of her feet at the time of release. Even though her intial foot placement is legal, I feel the pitch is illegal since she is pushing off from in front of the plate.

Legal or illegal?
Technically, illegal. In practice, allowed. I can't cite you anything on the latter, however. I'm interested to read other's views on this.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by kblump View Post
Fed rule set. Pitcher places her pivot foot heel on the plate, non-pivot foot toes on the plate. As she starts forward, she moves to the ball of her pivot foot to push off, but the ball of her foot is 3-4 inches in front of the plate due to how she intially placed her feet. That is the position of her feet at the time of release. Even though her intial foot placement is legal, I feel the pitch is illegal since she is pushing off from in front of the plate.

Legal or illegal?
Isn't the position of the feet at the time of the release considerably nearer to home plate than that? She's pushing forward and not releasing the pitch until near the end of her forward movement if she's a normal pitcher. I'm not sure I'd even go so far as to say this is technically illegal but I'd love to hear more thoughts on it too. (If you start calling this you'll be groundbreaking in a bad way)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:23pm
High Five Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 669
3-4 inches? Sounds like a replant to me and illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:24pm
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
As was already stated technically illegal. (6-1-2c) "Pushing off with the pivot foot from a place other than the pitcher's plate is illegal."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Is she moving her pivot foot further forward as she starts her motion? Or is she simply breaking contact with the pitching plate with her heel as she pushes off?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9
She does not pick up her entire for nor slide it forward, she simply lifts her heel and starts her push off the "plate" from that point. As I said, once she lifts her heel, the ball of her foot is a few inches in front of the plate.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by kblump View Post
She does not pick up her entire for nor slide it forward, she simply lifts her heel and starts her push off the "plate" from that point. As I said, once she lifts her heel, the ball of her foot is a few inches in front of the plate.
Then it is a completely legal pitch. If her feet are in a legal position to start she is in fact pushing off from the pitching plate even though her heel lifts off.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 03:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 648
This exact scenario is discussed in great detail below in Similar Threads (started by yours truly), complete with Visual Aids...
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 25, 2016, 07:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Then it is a completely legal pitch. If her feet are in a legal position to start she is in fact pushing off from the pitching plate even though her heel lifts off.
This^^^

For all those in the "must be in contact" when releasing the ball corner, I doubt that 95% of the pitches thrown meet such a demand.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 26, 2016, 07:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Then it is a completely legal pitch. If her feet are in a legal position to start she is in fact pushing off from the pitching plate even though her heel lifts off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
This^^^

For all those in the "must be in contact" when releasing the ball corner, I doubt that 95% of the pitches thrown meet such a demand.
Sure, but if (for example) you had in your association an umpire who was also a lawyer, he would point out that the pitch is illegal by the letter of the rule.

That argument does work, doesn't it?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 26, 2016, 08:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Sure, but if (for example) you had in your association an umpire who was also a lawyer, he would point out that the pitch is illegal by the letter of the rule.

That argument does work, doesn't it?
And then you point out the very next rule says the pivot foot must remain in contact with the ground and drag away from the pitching plate. How can the foot remain in contact with the pitching plate at the time the ball is released if it is dragging away from the pitching plate?

I had this argument from a coach one time who was mad I was calling his pitcher illegal for leaping. He came out with a rule book and by this point it was almost comical so I let him do it. He pointed to the rule about the foot being in contact with the pitching plate. At that time the rest of the rule was on the next page. I said yep, now turn the page and I pointed to the next rule and told him to get back in the dugout.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 26, 2016, 08:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
And then you point out the very next rule says the pivot foot must remain in contact with the ground and drag away from the pitching plate. How can the foot remain in contact with the pitching plate at the time the ball is released if it is dragging away from the pitching plate?

I had this argument from a coach one time who was mad I was calling his pitcher illegal for leaping. He came out with a rule book and by this point it was almost comical so I let him do it. He pointed to the rule about the foot being in contact with the pitching plate. At that time the rest of the rule was on the next page. I said yep, now turn the page and I pointed to the next rule and told him to get back in the dugout.
I wasn't making a serious argument... I was poking at a similar argument made in another thread.
__________________
Tom

Last edited by Dakota; Thu May 26, 2016 at 09:08am.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 26, 2016, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
I wasn't making a serious argument... I was poking at a similar argument made in another thread.
But wouldn't a lawyer be the best one to determine a legal pitch?

Or maybe this is a paralegal pitch.

Does the legality of this pitch involve tort?

Now I make a motion to exclude.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 26, 2016, 12:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Sure, but if (for example) you had in your association an umpire who was also a lawyer, he would point out that the pitch is illegal by the letter of the rule.

That argument does work, doesn't it?
But you honor, citing the published interpretation and direction concerning this point, RS#40.F clearly notes, "Dragging OR pushing off with the pivot foot from the pitcher's plate is required".
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal pitch? jmkupka Softball 16 Mon Feb 09, 2015 12:44pm
ASA Slow Pitch -- Legal Pitch?? gdc25 Softball 1 Fri Jun 30, 2006 02:22pm
legal pitch or not? ATLKEH Softball 16 Wed May 18, 2005 11:42am
Legal Pitch vs. Illegal Pitch ? Deion Softball 15 Mon Jun 30, 2003 04:24pm
Legal pitch? kchamp Softball 5 Wed Mar 06, 2002 06:06pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1