Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 06:24pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
I think I already admitted that the whole...
I think I already admitted that the whole intention is to deceive the defense. Is that being truthful enough?
Due to the way this scenario was presented it may be easy to make the call on this...
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 05:07pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 02:29pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
Agreed, but that chaos is what leads to better...
Agreed, but that chaos is what leads to better and more refined, less ambiguous rules.
I think Mike Sears is injecting his own philosophical view that there is no room in football for anything that...
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 02:06pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
In theory I agree with you Mike, however rules...
In theory I agree with you Mike, however rules like this: To use a player, replaced player or substitute in a substitution or pretend substitution to deceive opponents at or immediately before the...
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 01:42pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 12:53pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 12:18pm
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
Are you sure that is the correct interpretation...
Are you sure that is the correct interpretation of the rule? If it were as simple as that why does the rule itself include the ending "at or immediately before the snap or free kick?" Why would the...
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 11:37am
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 10:52am
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 07:49am
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
Re: NFHS Illegal participation
If that is the only rule I am not sure I agree with your call. How about if there is a enough time before the snap so it is not at or immediately before?
|
Forum: Football
Tue Sep 16, 2003, 01:09am
|
Replies: 44
Views: 6,353
|