The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 03, 2013, 06:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Mike Pereira was on a national radio show last night and they were talking about this situation. I just caught the last couple of minutes of it. He said that in the NFL, the HL should not move the chains at all until the R signals to him that it is a first down, which didn't happen since Tripplette was signaling third down before the snap.
True, but I believe the HL believed that Triplette was signaling first down, in fact that was what I think Al saw when he said a first down was rewarded. Looking at the replay, it is awfully tough to discern that it was a third down signal unless you were standing next to Triplette. All the time you see the HL signaling the chain gang to move when the runner obviously reached the line to gain.
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 08, 2013, 08:32pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Bengals' BenJarvus Green-Ellis Scores Controversial TD Against Colts | Bleacher Report

Triplette's on a roll.
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 08, 2013, 08:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
I watched several replays and could not tell if the NT made contact. It looks very possible he tripped on his own which means the reversal was correct. If Triplett did not look at the possible early contact then he may be in a bit of trouble. Per the pool report transcript he only looked at the goal line.
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 05:35am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj View Post
If Triplett did not look at the possible early contact then he may be in a bit of trouble. Per the pool report transcript he only looked at the goal line.
Correct.

Cincinnati Bengals vs. Indianapolis Colts Pool Report
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 08:58am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
Hey, thanks for proving my theory. You realize this isn't a forum to come and bitch about pro officials missing calls, right?
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
It appears to me they got this one right, despite the idiots claiming differently. This isn't NCAA rules people.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 09:04am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
My advice: maybe start a discussion to see if people here think the call was missed rather than just diving in and, well, I'll leave it at that.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 09:54am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Hey, thanks for proving my theory. You realize this isn't a forum to come and bitch about pro officials missing calls, right?
Doubt he's even a baseball umpire either. He's never once posted in the Baseball forum concerning a situation he was involved in.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
It appears to me they got this one right, despite the idiots claiming differently. This isn't NCAA rules people.
The issue here is the potential contact was not at the goal line but back at the 4/5 when he was tripped. That is the contact that was ruled to have put the runner down, but Triplett didn't look at that part of the play to determine if there was contact. I don't think it's conclusive so the call on the field should have stood.
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj View Post
The issue here is the potential contact was not at the goal line but back at the 4/5 when he was tripped. That is the contact that was ruled to have put the runner down,
How in the world could you possibly know this.

And ... seems to me in the replay there's no chance he was tripped by the NT (I admit the one video in this thread is inconclusive). The one shown on the NFL Red Zone was pretty clear.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 02:57pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
How in the world could you possibly know this.

And ... seems to me in the replay there's no chance he was tripped by the NT (I admit the one video in this thread is inconclusive). The one shown on the NFL Red Zone was pretty clear.
There was definitely a chance he was tripped, but I agree, it wasn't conclusive from the replay; even with stop-action on an HDTV.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 03:18pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
There was definitely a chance he was tripped, but I agree, it wasn't conclusive from the replay; even with stop-action on an HDTV.
Meaning the call on the field stands. It appears that they didn't go far enough back on the video to be able to accurately rule on the play.
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 03:22pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Doubt he's even a baseball umpire either. He's never once posted in the Baseball forum concerning a situation he was involved in.
Because it would be impossible to learn anything from reading about others' experiences or plays in MLB games, right [mod snip]

Last edited by Welpe; Mon Dec 09, 2013 at 03:23pm. Reason: Personal attack
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 03:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
There was definitely a chance he was tripped, but I agree, it wasn't conclusive from the replay; even with stop-action on an HDTV.
I disagree. The angle they showed a couple of times on tv conclusively showed space between the NT and the runner - he didn't touch him.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 09, 2013, 04:07pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
Meaning the call on the field stands. It appears that they didn't go far enough back on the video to be able to accurately rule on the play.
I haven't seen the replay, but you can't possibly know they didn't go back far enough. It's likely they had a different angle than you did.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giants game obstruction Forest Ump Baseball 11 Tue Oct 23, 2012 01:34pm
Redskins - Giants BktBallRef Football 7 Wed Sep 16, 2009 07:28pm
Obstruction in Giants/Phillies game Toadman15241 Baseball 10 Tue May 08, 2007 07:47am
MLB obstruction rule -- Giants vs. Cards game Tap Softball 4 Thu Oct 17, 2002 08:02pm
Giants - Redskins PeteBooth Football 2 Thu Jan 11, 2001 05:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1