The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 11, 2012, 06:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
Well, that's your opinion vs their opinion. I bet for now you can guess whose opinion should count on the field. And it's clear to me the onus of who has to make the adjustment is on the hitter vs the hittee in any of these type cases.
It still hasn't been supported by rule...imagine that.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
It still hasn't been supported by rule...imagine that.
In your opinion. In the opinion of those who determine what is supported by rule and what is not, 9-1-4 says it is and should be a foul. Realize that.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 02:23pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
In your opinion. In the opinion of those who determine what is supported by rule and what is not, 9-1-4 says it is and should be a foul. Realize that.
If you are saying a rule has been violated, you should reference the rule that was violated. I am still waiting for some explanation so that when I make this call I would be supported. I work for the same people that assign the Big Ten (Midwest Alliance) so I would like to hear their take on this issue. At least these guys have slow motion and different angles. We might get two angles and no slow motion other than what we use for Hudi or some other site that might be used for that game.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 02:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Just like the foul in the Cowboy game...

Coach: "What did my guy do wrong? He didn't hit him in the head or with his head?"
Me: "Well coach, it just looked bad - I had to flag it because it would look bad if I didn't."

Where is this game going...
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 03:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
late to the party

I agree with Rut, don't like the fact that there was a flag on the play. I disagree with Rut, in that it doesn't appear to be launching...When I watched the slow motion, it appeared the blocker did "launch" not in the classic sense of launching to someone's head, but he did extedn and appear to leave his feet...None of us are good enough to judge this full speed correctly all the time, that is why they give us philosophys to go by....by philosophy in my opinion this looks like a launch, couple this with the violence (which is just part of the game) and I understand why there is a flag....and since in my opinion the official used philosophy to make the call (yes just my opinion), if I were an evaluator, I would also support the call....the support would look like this, depending on how the foul was written up in the report...I can see why you made the call based on philosophy, however a no call here would have been supported as well....
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you"
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 04:00pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
The launch in itself is not a foul. It is a sign that a foul might be taking place. As was illustrated by Northwestern at Vanderbilt (2011) and the Big Ten apologized for an incorrect call on a "launch" foul that clearly did not involve helmet contact.

So we can split hairs if that was a launch, but the Big Ten did not support another call for that reason obviously a year ago. I am just wanting some evidence of why this was a good call. If they say that there was helmet contact I can live with their position. I am just saying that UNR has to be justified somehow other than, "We support the call."

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
If you are saying a rule has been violated, you should reference the rule that was violated. I am still waiting for some explanation so that when I make this call I would be supported. I work for the same people that assign the Big Ten (Midwest Alliance) so I would like to hear their take on this issue. At least these guys have slow motion and different angles. We might get two angles and no slow motion other than what we use for Hudi or some other site that might be used for that game.

Peace
Ummmm, was the 9-1-4 referrence not legible enough for you?
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 12, 2012, 07:52pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
Ummmm, was the 9-1-4 referrence not legible enough for you?
Did the Big Ten reference 9-1-4?

And it is debatable if he hit him in that the head and neck area. And it is very debatable if he was defenseless. Hard to call a player 5 yards or so behind the ball carrier. Oh well, then again you have to know the rule to know what they need to say to you to make you feel like this is the right call.

I can be a smarta$$ too ya know.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)

Last edited by JRutledge; Wed Dec 12, 2012 at 08:02pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFC Championship - was that a TD? canuckrefguy Football 38 Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:00pm
ACC championship eyezen Basketball 20 Wed Mar 18, 2009 08:29am
Block at the end puts team in championship game Mark Padgett General / Off-Topic 0 Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:39am
Div II Championship canuckrefguy Basketball 13 Sun Mar 25, 2007 08:53am
difference between cut block and chop block ase Football 7 Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1