The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:22pm
Broadcaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LaGrange, Ga.
Posts: 364
Sideline interference

NFHS. B17 intercepts a pass at their own 10 and runs it back 90 yards into the end zone. At A's 30 the sideline judge runs into an assistant coach who was on the field. Their shoulders collided but the official was still able to run down the field.

What is the call? I wasn't there and didn't see the result in the video, but the newspaper wrote:

"Wright was picked off on the next play by Fabian Few at the 10 and the Bulldog senior return it 90 yards untouched for what looked like a game-breaking score with 0:04 left in the half.

The Thomson bench, however, was flagged for sideline interference when the side judge, trailing 15 yards behind the play, ran into the shoulder of a celebrating Bulldog assistant and nullified the touchdown with a flag."

According to the box score, the touchdown was indeed nullified.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:32pm
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
The call was sideline interference, 9-4-8

Quote:
Unintentional contact with a game official in the restricted area. Nonplayer foul (Art. 8) – (S38; 29). For the first offense, 15 yards from the succeeding spot. For the second offense (S38- 29- 47) – 15 yards from the succeeding spot and disqualification of the head coach. Disqualification also if any foul is flagrant – (S47).
Sounds as if it was enforced incorrectly. Its a succeeding spot foul.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:33pm
Medium Kahuna
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: At home
Posts: 791
If that's what happened, the officials screwed up: the basic spot for any non-player foul is the succeeding spot. 10-4-5c
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 220
There's lots of worse ways for a crew to learn that lesson, but it should be a pretty fundamental call from a rules perspective. It's an effective learning tool to see your mistakes written about in the newspaper, let alone permanently engraved on the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:30pm
Broadcaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LaGrange, Ga.
Posts: 364
It didn't affect the outcome of the game. If the assistant coach had been where he was supposed to have been, it wouldn't have happened.

I wouldn't have known it was an incorrect enforcement. Thanks for the education.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 11, 2012, 10:42pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Was there maybe another penalty on the play?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 13, 2012, 09:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northwest PA
Posts: 55
Correct call, incorrect enforcement.

I myself "bumped" into 3 coaches this year, 2 of them were on TD's.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sideline interference Forksref Football 1 Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:16am
Sideline Interference DrMooreReferee Football 2 Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:17am
Sideline Warning/Sideline Interference Brandon Kincer Football 16 Sat May 23, 2009 09:33am
LGP and the Sideline grunewar Basketball 2 Thu Mar 19, 2009 07:18am
sideline interference 86362 Football 10 Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:46am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1