The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Nfl opi

What's the NFL penalty for OPI - just 5 yards? No LOD?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:18am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
10 yards, no LOD.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
10 yards, no LOD.
I think they only marked off 5 last night on the Lions during the final drive.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 09:50am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
They were having some issues with PI last night...
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:59am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
According to the official play-by-play, the ball was at the 32 prior to the penalty...then the ball was snapped on the 42 after the OPI penalty.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:32am
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
It should be a loss of down... but that's another topic.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
It should be a loss of down... but that's another topic.
Hell, it should be loss of ball. And at one time, it was.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:59pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Hell, it should be loss of ball. And at one time, it was.
I disagree. Loss of possession is way too much of a penalty.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 01:22pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
It should be a loss of down... but that's another topic.
No...Fed can keep that one for themselves.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
I disagree. Loss of possession is way too much of a penalty.
When you interfere with the other team's player's opp'ty to catch the ball -- whether they were the passing team or you were -- why shouldn't the penalty be at least as if the fouled player had caught the ball there?

The justification at lower levels for an enforcement from the previous spot is that the players don't catch as well, so the rules don't presume the fouled player would've caught the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 01:50pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
When you interfere with the other team's player's opp'ty to catch the ball -- whether they were the passing team or you were -- why shouldn't the penalty be at least as if the fouled player had caught the ball there?

The justification at lower levels for an enforcement from the previous spot is that the players don't catch as well, so the rules don't presume the fouled player would've caught the ball.
The offence has the advantage of knowing the play. That is their advantage and it should remain.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 02:00pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by welpe View Post
no...fed can keep that one for themselves.
+1
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 17, 2012, 02:14pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
+1
I agree. If I was king, the first thing I'd remove from NFHS rules is the LOD on OPI. Well, it would be in the Top 10 anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
The offence has the advantage of knowing the play. That is their advantage and it should remain.
I don't understand what you mean. Because they know the play, shouldn't they be even more liable in some way for PI? How does the advantage of knowing the play mitigate their player's responsibility to not interfere with an opponent's attempt at a catch? A defender might have his back to the ball and not know a pass is on the way.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:47am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
I don't understand what you mean. Because they know the play, shouldn't they be even more liable in some way for PI? How does the advantage of knowing the play mitigate their player's responsibility to not interfere with an opponent's attempt at a catch? A defender might have his back to the ball and not know a pass is on the way.
The NFL doesn't have a LOD for OPI. From what I suspect, neither does the NCAA. And neither do all codes of Canadian football. Maybe, just maybe, the Fed is the odd man out.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1