The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 07:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
I've got a question. If two players signal for a fair catch, are both player protected?

Play.

4 & 5 at K-20. R1 and R2 are at the hash marks to receive the kick. K1 punts the ball between R1 and R2. While the ball is still in flight, both R1 and R2 signal for a fair catch. At the last moment, R2 stears clear and is blocked by K2. R1 completes the fair catch.

Ruling?

__________________
Mike Sears
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
Legal, I think. The only player offered protection is the player who catches the ball, IMHO anyway
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 09:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
In both the FEDERATION and NCAA codes, any R/B player who gives a valid legal signal is afforded protection. Likewise, each such B player restricted from blocking until the kick ends (FED) or until he touches the kick (NCAA).
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 09:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 223
Only the player who catches the ball. But remember, both have the blocking restrictions on them before the kick is ended.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 10:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Okay, I'm getting two different answers here. I'm looking for a FED ruling. Are both players who signal protected or JUST the player who catches the ball. I'm curious as to what support you can present for the position you take. I'm without a casebook today so I don't know if this is covered there or not.

Thanks!

__________________
Mike Sears
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 11:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally posted by mikesears
Okay, I'm getting two different answers here. I'm looking for a FED ruling. Are both players who signal protected or JUST the player who catches the ball. I'm curious as to what support you can present for the position you take. I'm without a casebook today so I don't know if this is covered there or not.

Thanks!

I'm also without my books today but I believe both are protected. If a player has given a valid FC signal he's expecting that protection. If just for saftey, I believe we need to give it to him
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2003, 01:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 710
Contacting a receiver who did not give a fair catch signal or contacting a receiver who has given a signal but is contacted where he cannot make a fair catch is not a foul unless the contact is judged to be a personal foul. The receiver is not afforded special protection in such situations. Members of the kicking team have the responsibility of knowing when the ball is dead. If a kicker could not have seen a fair catch signal made by a teammate of the receiver, there is no foul. However, if he could have seen the signal, he does not have license to contact the receiver.

That's from the case book comment on Rule 6.5.3.

I guess it's a foul in this case if they're near each other.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 08:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
The first question you need to answer is: when does a kick end? It ends when the ball is caught or muffed. Any receiver who makes a FC is protected/limited from making contact with a member of the K team. After the ball is muffed, not caught, the protection ends, for all players, because the "Kick" has ended. It's still a loose ball play, but the "Kick" has ended.
__________________
What is Real Football?????
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally posted by The Ref of OZ!!!
The first question you need to answer is: when does a kick end? It ends when the ball is caught or muffed. Any receiver who makes a FC is protected/limited from making contact with a member of the K team. After the ball is muffed, not caught, the protection ends, for all players, because the "Kick" has ended. It's still a loose ball play, but the "Kick" has ended.
Oz, Sorry my good buddy but thats wrong. The muff does not end the kick. The kick ends when a player gains possession or when then ball becomes dead by rule.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2003, 03:07pm
JMN JMN is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 296
I agree with James's previous post that a kick does not end until there is possession.

This year, NCAA rules also provide for R to have an unimpeded opportunity to catch a muffed ball on a scrimmage kick. So, it is still a kick until R muffs an attempted catch and then catches the ball, thus securing possession or, R muffs the catch and K or another R player secures possession to end the kick.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2003, 04:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Unless I'm mistaken, that need for the kickers to allow B to complete the catch after a muff only applies to a situation where B has signalled for a fair catch. No signal...no need for A to "wait" for B's catch. At least, that's what I read:

NCAA 6-5-1a: ”When a Team B player makes a fair catch, the ball becomes dead where caught and belongs to Team B at that spot (Exception: When a valid fair catch signal is made, the unimpeded opportunity to catch a free or scrimmage kick is extended to a player who muffs the kick and still has an opportunity to complete the catch. This protection terminates when the kick touches the ground. If the player subsequently catches the kick, the ball is placed where it was first touched) (A.R. 6-5-1-I-IV)."
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2003, 05:08pm
JMN JMN is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 296
Bob M.

So right!!

I omitted that R must signal for a fair catch to continue protection as he tries to catch his muffed kick.

Thanks Bob.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 07, 2003, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3
Do we have a invalid or illegal fair catch situation on this play?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 07, 2003, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 710
No. Everybody on R could conceivably give a FC signal while the ball was in the air. That wouldn't be to their advantage, though, as that would kill it as soon as one of R's folks caught it.

Invalid if it is incorrect as to it's form. Illegal if it is given after the kick has ended (a runner shall not give an illegal FC signal).
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 07, 2003, 10:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
"That wouldn't be to their advantage, though, as that would kill it as soon as one of R's folks caught it."

A signal by anyone on the R team will kill the ball as soon as it's caught, at least in NFHS. I don't know about NCAA.
__________________
What is Real Football?????
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1