The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   2 questions about high school football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/81839-2-questions-about-high-school-football.html)

bigjohn Fri Oct 07, 2011 08:13am

ART. 2 . . . No team shall repeatedly commit fouls which halve the distance to
the goal line

By this rule it would be after 8 kicks OOB.

MD Longhorn Fri Oct 07, 2011 08:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjohn (Post 792013)
ART. 2 . . . No team shall repeatedly commit fouls which halve the distance to
the goal line

By this rule it would be after 8 kicks OOB.

Glad you're not on the field. That is NOT what this rule is about.

buckrog64 Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:28pm

js: you hear all sorts of stuff from all sorts of people in this 'business.' Last week I had a freshman coach inform me that there was no longer a difference in facemasking penalties between 5 or 15 yards. All were now 15. Another official had told him so. Hmmm, ok.

Forksref Sat Oct 08, 2011 07:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 792014)
Glad you're not on the field. That is NOT what this rule is about.

I think you half the distance if it was butt-blocking.;)

mbyron Sat Oct 08, 2011 07:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forksref (Post 792219)
I think you half the distance if it was butt-blocking.;)

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...dup29zd7pfGsFw

BktBallRef Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckrog64 (Post 792082)
js: you hear all sorts of stuff from all sorts of people in this 'business.' Last week I had a freshman coach inform me that there was no longer a difference in facemasking penalties between 5 or 15 yards. All were now 15. Another official had told him so. Hmmm, ok.

NCAA rule. No incidental. It's either 15 or nothing.

ODJ Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 791898)
Except in Texas and Massachusetts, of course.

Fed experimented with this in Oregon a few years back. Not sure if it still is in effect.

As the R - I'm against it. :)

js2397 Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:58am

Thanks, the issue was another coach I know was kicking the ball out of bounds at the end of the half to keep the other team from returning the kick for a TD. He thought there was a limit on the number of times you could make the kicking team rekick. The officials that night said no and he had to kick in bounds and the return team scored a TD. I asked an official at my game the following week as did he and we got two different answers.

bigjohn Wed Oct 12, 2011 09:57am

I personally don't like the rule against K kicking the ball out of bounds. If you have a kid that can kick the ball OOB inside the 5 yl, he should not be penalized for R not being able to field it first.

Robert Goodman Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjohn (Post 793002)
I personally don't like the rule against K kicking the ball out of bounds. If you have a kid that can kick the ball OOB inside the 5 yl, he should not be penalized for R not being able to field it first.

If the makers of the game at higher levels really want to reduce the amount of bodies flying into each other at high speed on the free kick runbacks, as it seems they've wanted to do recently, they should adopt rugby's rule of having the kick to go out of bounds be legal as long as it touches the ground or a player first. Team R would concentrate more on protecting the sidelines, which would spread them out more, and kicks would be lower and aimed toward sidelines more often, so you'd have less of players taking a long run at each other down the middle with a wedge of blockers.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1