Quote:
Originally posted by 4 Sport Official
Quote:
Originally posted by Derock1986
Quote:
Originally posted by Derock1986
Quote:
|
Originally posted by 4 Sport Official
|
It was a bad call because it was clearly a questionable call and it was HUGE in deciding the outcome of the game.
|
Here is the rule to support my statement...NFHS Rule 9-4-4c.
A defensive player shall neither run into the kicker nor holder, which is contact that displaces the kicker or holder without roughing; nor block, tackle or charge into the kicker of a scrimmage kick, or the place-kick holder, other than when:
c. Contact is slight and is partially caused by movement of the kicker.
|
Clearly a questionable call? I disagree.
More importantly, why is a guy who supposedly did not own/use a rule book quoting Fed rules, in reference to a situation in an NFL game?
Kickers are highly-paid specialists at the NFL level, and are afforded an even higher level of protection.
|
What does how much kickers make have to do with anything???
More importantly, Nedney himself admitted that his "acting" might land him a role in Hollywood (or something to that effect) which leads me to believe that even Nedney didn't in all honesty believe he deserved the call.
The call was definitely a "questionable" call. If it wasn't questionable, why is the play under such scrutiny???
What I saw was slight contact not enough to warrant a flag under any situation especially at this critical point in the game. As an official in any sport, you never want to make a call that decides the game unless it is blatantly obvious in EVERYONE's eyes and NOT just "my judgement". When you make this call in this situation, you automatically give a team an edge.
The Titans gained an advantageous call that decided the game on a questionable foul. This is a bad call--should not have been made. Game sense, GET SOME!!!!
Wed Jan 15, 2003, 06:21pm
Threaded Mode
