The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 09, 2002, 02:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 65
Wink Holy Crap!

We actually agree on this point!

The goal is to make the situation better, not worse. No matter what has been reported, there have been several incidents involving officials' abuse throughout the history of this league. This incident wasn't even the worst.

However, the league has just recently adopted many measures to deal with situations such as these. It's a step in the right direction.

I wonder what kind of message the league's executive board sends to its members when they still keep the "coach" in question involved as the VP of the league, but fires the refs?

There are a few articles in the baseball section about how one youth league handles disputes with officiating. It was a very proactive and positive approach to an inherently volatile and competitive environment. It could easily be applied to any youth sport. In short, the chief-official is appointed and has the last say over all disputed rules situations. The example given requires the umpire-in-chief to be on call and available via cell phone. When a dispute arises, if the UIC isn't on-site, they call him/her and ask for a ruling. The UIC's ruling is FINAL. The league's board deals with discipline, the UIC deals with rules.

Check it out! There are links to other articles inside this one!

http://baseball.officiating.com/x/article/2500

__________________
Snrmike
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1