The ruling from the Fall 2001 Quarterly was the initial ruling but it was changed last year. The wording in this year's casebook was a direct result of the discussion that occurred from the newsletter play. We discussed this play at length last year on the McGriff board and it popped up again this year. Here's the link to the latest discussion on this play.
http://www.gmcgriff.com/refonline/ww...ges/26409.html
Some of the most knowledgable posters on the McGriff board replied to the post such as SRH, Tom Heisey, and Bob M. Take a look!
Thu Jul 11, 2002, 08:39pm
Hybrid Mode
