The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Kincer View Post
Thanks for the encouragement, What exactly is a covered up player?
A "covered up" player is one who begins a play as an eligible receiver (both by position and number) on the end of the line who is rendered ineligible, either deliberately or unintentionally, by the actions of another player, who takes a wider position on the same side of the line.

The "covered" player, although still eligible by number, would no longer be eligible by position as he is no longer on the end of the line.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 09:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 73
Send a message via AIM to Brandon Kincer
ah ok that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 10:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
Brandon,
Let me jump right in! So you don't get off on the wrong foot, there is no situation in NFHS football where a penalty causes the ball to become dead or "blown dead" as you stated.

Source: Football Fundamental IX. 1) No live ball foul causes the ball to become dead.

While this is not the case in other codes of football, it is most certainly the case in NFHS.
From this year's Points of Emphasis -

The old idea of "hitting until the whistle" is passé. It must be remembered by coaches and officials that the whistle is only confirmation that a play is over. The play kills itself.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 02:08am
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Waltjp:
I am not sure I understand what you are attempting to say?
While I agree with this years point of emphasis, it has nothing to do with "No live ball foul causes the ball to become dead"
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 08:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
ART. 6 . . . Pass eligibility rules apply only to a legal forward pass. The
following players are eligible pass receivers:
a. All A players eligible by position and number include those who, at the time
of the snap, are on the ends of their scrimmage line or legally behind the
line (possible total of six) and are numbered 1-49 or 80-99. (See 7-2-5a
EXCEPTION)
b. All A players become eligible when B touches a legal forward pass.
c. All B players are eligible.
d. A player who is eligible at the start of the down remains eligible throughout
the down.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 08:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
Waltjp:
I am not sure I understand what you are attempting to say?
While I agree with this years point of emphasis, it has nothing to do with "No live ball foul causes the ball to become dead"
Yeah, perhaps poorly worded, but it does. The question was whether to blow the whistle when you see a foul. The answer, of course, is no.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 09:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp View Post
Yeah, perhaps poorly worded, but it does. The question was whether to blow the whistle when you see a foul. The answer, of course, is no.
Not even in the case of the hideout play (simulated substitution to get the defense to ignore a receiver)?
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 10:22am
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Robert-
I see where you are going now!
No, you do not have rule support to shut down a "hideout play" or any play for that matter. That being said however you do have rule support to enforce the penalty as a previous spot foul.
Rule 9-6-4...It is illegal participation:
b. To use a player, replaced player, substitute, coach, trainer, or other attendant in a substitution or pretend substitution to deceive opponents at or immediately before the snap or free kick.
PENALTY: 4b-f (live-ball, previous spot) - (S28) - 15 yards

Also see 2008 NFHS CASE BOOK, Page 76 - 9.6.4 SITUATION B
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber

Last edited by KWH; Wed May 13, 2009 at 10:51am. Reason: To correct the page number
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 11:27am
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Thumbs down Wrong!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
A "covered up" player is one who begins a play as an eligible receiver (both by position and number) on the end of the line who is rendered ineligible, either deliberately or unintentionally, by the actions of another player, who takes a wider position on the same side of the line.

The "covered" player, although still eligible by number, would no longer be eligible by position as he is no longer on the end of the line.
AJMC- (aka AlinupstateNY)
You'll excuse me if I take the opportunity to point out WHAT YOU WROTE is poorly worded and misleading, and therefore, by NFHS definition, renders itself to be false and incorrect!

Source 2008 NFHS Rule Book Page 82 Football Fundamentals VII. Passes
1.A player who is eligible at the start of a down remains eligible throughout the down.

It is just not possible for a player who "...begins a play as an eligible reciever..." to then become "...rendered ineligible..."
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
AJMC- (aka AlinupstateNY)
You'll excuse me if I take the opportunity to point out WHAT YOU WROTE is poorly worded and misleading, and therefore, by NFHS definition, renders itself to be false and incorrect!

Source 2008 NFHS Rule Book Page 82 Football Fundamentals VII. Passes
1.A player who is eligible at the start of a down remains eligible throughout the down.

It is just not possible for a player who "...begins a play as an eligible reciever..." to then become "...rendered ineligible..."
Congratulations, you are absolutely correct, I blew right by Football Fundamental VII and used a poorly worded, and possibly misleading phrase, to try and explain a basic concept. Good thing you were there to avoid a calamity.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by With_Two_Flakes View Post
By "covered up", he means someone on the line with an eligible number who is supposed to be on the end of the line. But they are not on the end of the line because someone out wide, who should be off the line has messed up and is on the line and therefore "covering him up".

Example:- Formation should be,

..................82..71..68..55..62..77........89
..84

but #84 messes up and it actually is

..84.............82..71..68..55..62..77........89

so #82 is "covered up" because of #84's mistake.
I understand what you are saying but some of it could be a little misleading. The person being covered may not be there in error. As someone else noted, some teams line up this way intentionally for running plays. There is nothing wrong with that. Also, he may be covered up because he's supposed to be in the back field but lined up wrong (rather than the wide-out).

I would simplify the explanation as a player with an eligible number on the line of scrimmage who is not on the end.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 16, 2009, 07:15pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Lightbulb Canadian Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Kincer View Post
Please respond
CANADIAN ANSWER:

Eligible:
  • 1-39 or 70-99 and the widest player on the line, or any player in the backfield, and isn't an ineligible receiver (see definition) or
  • 40-69, has reported to the Referee, and is not in an ineligible position

Ineligible:
  • 40-69, or
  • other # and reported as ineligible
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ineligible Down Field F C E Football 11 Wed Oct 24, 2007 02:08pm
Ineligible or Not? Simbio Football 4 Wed Sep 26, 2007 05:41pm
Eligible/Ineligible? WyMike Football 19 Fri Oct 22, 2004 03:43pm
Ineligible downfield / OPI Wes Football 10 Wed Oct 13, 2004 09:45am
Eligible or ineligible receiver Derock1986 Football 18 Thu Dec 05, 2002 03:04am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1