The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   Mike Carey (https://forum.officiating.com/football/41610-mike-carey.html)

waltjp Wed Feb 06, 2008 01:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HLin NC
as to why the 12th player was on the field to begin with? How do you not know in the NFL if you are on the punt return team or not?

Probably the same way as in pee-wees - your coach tells you.

OverAndBack Wed Feb 06, 2008 07:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HLin NC
as to why the 12th player was on the field to begin with? How do you not know in the NFL if you are on the punt return team or not?

The guy in question went to Akron, not MIT. :)

MJT Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue37
Does the NFL have an equivalent to the NFHS rule?

Rule 3 Periods, Time Factors and Substitutions
SECTION 1 LENGTH OF PERIODS
ART. 3 A period or periods may be shortened in any emergency by agreement of the opposing coaches and the referee. By mutual agreement of the opposing coaches and the referee, any remaining period may be shortened at any time or the game terminated.

In a Fed game, if I see the coaches heading for mid-field to shake hands, I accept that as their agreement to terminate the game. My agreement is demonstrated by leaving the field.

I do not see that as an NFL rule in the official NFL rule book that I have.

Sonofanump Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob M.
REPLY: At one time, if I'm not mistaken, it was not reviewable. Then there was a high-profile mistake (allegedly) where Bill Cowher was running off the field at halftime livid, showing the referee one of those Polaroid shots they take that had their opponent (again, allegedly) with twelve guys on the field. After that, I believe, they made it a reviewable situation.

Is this the same coach who tought that his player was allowed to change his call of the coin toss in the air? :D

daggo66 Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:15pm

Just to play devil's advocate here, do you want your wing official watching someone's feet to see if he just barely makes it off the field or not at the snap, OR would you rather he be watching the LOS for the false start that he may miss while deciding whether or not someone made it out of bounds? At the high school level I would be much more concerned about the penalty that could effect the play rather than one that has no bearing whatsoever.

Rich Thu Feb 07, 2008 08:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by daggo66
Just to play devil's advocate here, do you want your wing official watching someone's feet to see if he just barely makes it off the field or not at the snap, OR would you rather he be watching the LOS for the false start that he may miss while deciding whether or not someone made it out of bounds? At the high school level I would be much more concerned about the penalty that could effect the play rather than one that has no bearing whatsoever.

Being the contrarian above, I'll answer.

No, I don't want the wings turning heads and missing play at the line of scrimmage. What I said was I don't want them ignoring it cause the player is only a step or two from the sidelines. If they miss it because they're officiating and the player runs out of their line of sight, fine. We don't have 7 officials in my state.

I also don't mind if someone else gets this if it's obvious (back judge, for example).

daggo66 Thu Feb 07, 2008 08:39am

I absolutely agree. I can tell you, however, that my crew will not make that call if he is a step off the sideline.

JRutledge Thu Feb 07, 2008 02:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN
Being the contrarian above, I'll answer.

No, I don't want the wings turning heads and missing play at the line of scrimmage. What I said was I don't want them ignoring it cause the player is only a step or two from the sidelines. If they miss it because they're officiating and the player runs out of their line of sight, fine. We don't have 7 officials in my state.

I also don't mind if someone else gets this if it's obvious (back judge, for example).

I completely agree. If a player doesn't get off the field this is not my problem to save a penalty for your team. That is the problem of the team and the players. I think officials spend too much time trying to be safe than making a call that can clearly be seen on tape. And in this case, it was very clear on tape that the Giants player was two or three steps on the field when the ball was snapped. But I also agree that I am not turning my head just to make the call and I am not stepping onto the field to not make the call either.

Peace

MadCityRef Thu Feb 07, 2008 03:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
I completely agree. If a player doesn't get off the field this is not my problem to save a penalty for your team. That is the problem of the team and the players. I think officials spend too much time trying to be safe than making a call that can clearly be seen on tape. And in this case, it was very clear on tape that the Giants player was two or three steps on the field when the ball was snapped. But I also agree that I am not turning my head just to make the call and I am not stepping onto the field to not make the call either.

Peace

That's why the wing steps forward onto the field to let the kid get off in time. "He was behind me, coach. I only have eyes in the front of my head."

JRutledge Thu Feb 07, 2008 05:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadCityRef
That's why the wing steps forward onto the field to let the kid get off in time. "He was behind me, coach. I only have eyes in the front of my head."

First of all it is a cop out. Secondly, I want to start on the sideline, not several steps on the sideline. I have also seen officials do this and miss the hiding substitute play as well.

If that is acceptable where you live that is fine, but I would not be the one advocating that practice. Because there are other things you could miss and if you miss a deception play because you had to step foreword, I would rather take the chance of taking the heat for an IP called than missing something bigger because I was not in position.

Peace

OverAndBack Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
And in this case, it was very clear on tape that the Giants player was two or three steps on the field when the ball was snapped.

One and a half. Maybe two.

http://www.kenn.com/images/giants_12th_man.jpg

OverAndBack Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:23pm

Or, slightly harder to see but the best I can do:

http://www.kenn.com/images/giants.gif

jimpiano Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
First of all it is a cop out. Secondly, I want to start on the sideline, not several steps on the sideline. I have also seen officials do this and miss the hiding substitute play as well.

If that is acceptable where you live that is fine, but I would not be the one advocating that practice. Because there are other things you could miss and if you miss a deception play because you had to step foreword, I would rather take the chance of taking the heat for an IP called than missing something bigger because I was not in position.

Peace


Another example of the joke of instant replay.

It was supposed to correct obvious errors.

From the previous posts it appears most officials consider a 12th leaving the field to not be worth much of their bother.

A player one step from being off the field obviously had no bearing on the play as most of you have already agreed.

Can the NFL use a little common sense here?

JugglingReferee Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Another example of the joke of instant replay.

It was supposed to correct obvious errors.

From the previous posts it appears most officials consider a 12th leaving the field to not be worth much of their bother.

A player one step from being off the field obviously had no bearing on the play as most of you have already agreed.

Can the NFL use a little common sense here?

There you go sensationalizing things again. The NFL rule is as it is partly to remove judgment from the officials. This way, the game is more consistent. Surely players and coaches making millions are accountable for fielding the correct number of players.

The play was properly reviewed and Mike Carey properly threw the flag after review.

If you don't like the rule, then that's fine. (Such fact only shows you don't understand professional football.) But to dis IR? POW.....

JRutledge Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Another example of the joke of instant replay.

It was supposed to correct obvious errors.

From the previous posts it appears most officials consider a 12th leaving the field to not be worth much of their bother.

A player one step from being off the field obviously had no bearing on the play as most of you have already agreed.

Can the NFL use a little common sense here?

This has nothing to do with common sense. The Giants had 12 players on the field no doubt about it. It is against the rules to have 12 players on the field. If they did not make that call, then everyone would have been crying conspiracy or accused the officials of ignoring the rules or purposely going against the Patriots. And even in NF rules and NCAA rules, this would be a penalty as well. In the NF you could make a case for Illegal Substitution not Illegal Participation.

Peace


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1