|
|||
QB for A is scrambling out of the pocket (A runs a very effective run and shoot offense). In his effort to avoid being sacked, he ventures very close to the LOS. When he releases the ball, he has definitely entered the nuetral zone. Umpire tosses his flag for Illegal pass. I am awaiting the film to review. From my perspective about 7 yds downfield, it was very close.
Do you provide lee way in these situations? When I referee, I tend to provide some lattitude to the QB, within reason. How do you handle? zeb
__________________
patrick schneider zebraman55 |
|
|||
Quote:
Leeway is leeway, and on things like that, it's always a judgement concept. However, your phrase is key "when the (qb) releases the beall, he has definitely entered the neutral zone." No leeway. Definite is definite. Your Ump was 100% positive... he threw the flag.
__________________
Am I just a three-down ref in a four-down world? |
|
|||
On a pass play, I'll give the linemen a 2 to 2 1/2 yard leeway downdfield (expanded NZ), but the QB I'll rule tighter. I don't have my rule book, but I'm sure the rule says that the passer has to have both feet in or behind the NZ when he releases the ball. So you may not have an IFP in your case. I'd probably let him slide if he had one foot barely beyond the NZ.
|
|
|||
The passer cannot throw a pass from beyond the NZ. The down box is the reference point. If the passers foot/feet are beyond, then the pass is illegal.
It's a tough call to make on a pass thrown from the line judge side of the field especially in a four man game. The flag is usually a late flag in that case. How much leeway? should be none. The problem to deal with is are the feet beyond the box or not. Whether you toss a flag or drop a bag for a possible flag later, one thing for sure is that flag/bag has to be at the spot of the passers feet or you will make the incorrect call. |
|
|||
"When he releases the ball, he has definitely entered the nuetral zone. Umpire tosses his flag for Illegal pass."
If the passer is still IN the neutral zone (as your post implies), ther's no foul. Also, why is the umpire making the call? He's supposed to be watching line action, and shouldn't be that close. As a former ump, he'd have to be past me for me to throw the flag. Bob |
|
|||
Umpire's jurisdiction on QB and illegal pass
THe posts for this thread regard the los as sacred (as it should be), but might the QB have some latitude for closeness to the los? In other words, at what point do you rule he has crossed the NX - when he is clearly over with both feet, over with one foot, over with one toe?
Also, having been an umpire for several years, I have always gone with the theory that this flag belongs to the R, and my role, if I happen to detect this, is to bag the spot of the foremost foot (as close as possible - on the yard line through it), and allow the referee to move forward and determine the legality of the action. As noted, the Umpire does move up to the los, but in order to ascertain the legality of the QB's action, the umpire had better be at the los, with the appropriate angle. AN umpire might detect this action if the QB rolls and the flow of blockers/defender pursuit moves the same way. NOt so sure this is the Ump's call. zeb
__________________
patrick schneider zebraman55 |
|
|||
Actually, Pat, I think that bagging the front foot of the quarterback is a great idea when it's on the LJ side of the field. Our Assoc. teaches that this is the umpire's flag but you could still bag it until you can take time to get a better look at it. I may try this one sometime.
|
|
|||
Quote:
BTW, is there some taboo in revealing what states we work for. It seems everyone avoids mentioning where they are from. |
|
|||
Quote:
BTW, North Carolina. http://www.saoa.faync.com
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
Bookmarks |
|
|