The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 24, 2006, 10:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
As an attorney, I can tell you you are wrong about just about all of this.
I wasn't posting specifically about this case. I'm not a lawyer and I wouldn't have a clue about how the specifics of this case will be handled by a judge and jury.

My point was employers are not free to set any arbitrary standard they wish. Am I wrong about that? I can think of a whole lot of arbitrary standards from the old days that aren't around anymore (hopefully, in most places, but I'm sure they exist in others).

I was commenting specifically on that point, in response to someone else.

As far as the contractor status goes, I'm sure that does change things. Not being an official, I wasn't aware of that important point. It will probably entirely boil down to the language in the contract won't it?

I was aware in a lawsuit you are going to be dealing specifically with the individual(s) who brought suit. Forgive me, poor choice of words on that on.

Go reread my post looking at my comments more generally, rather than the specifics here. Am I still wrong? Other than the last part. Granted I probably should have left out the part about "disability being on the list", because it does make it seem like I'm saying this qualifies. But I wasn't trying to say that. With that comment I was only saying that this type situation could possibly be one that might get looked at, since employment rights for the disabled are protected to some degree. You seem to think his disabilty isn't severe enough to qualify. Point taken, I don't know.

I was only trying to say that generally employers cannot arbitrarilly fire (or not hire) people for reasons such as race, gender, age, religion, disability, etc...

As far as his specific case is concerned, I don't doubt you are correct. You don't even have an employer-employee relationship here.

Last edited by grizwald; Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 11:46am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 24, 2006, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizwald
I was only trying to say that generally employers cannot arbitrarilly fire (or not hire) people for reasons such as race, gender, age, religion, disability, etc...
Sure they can. It's done all the time. Proving they fired or didn't hire for those reasons is the difficult part.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 24, 2006, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Sure they can. It's done all the time. Proving they fired or didn't hire for those reasons is the difficult part.
Point taken, the law doesn't allow it - but it happens and one would have to prove it to a degree.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One-eyed Referee Sues Big Ten Over Firing jeffpea Basketball 12 Fri Jul 21, 2006 08:55pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1