End Zone Pylon Question

[adrenaline]

I have no idea who's right and who is wrong. I am curious as well.. Should the play have been called a catch.. according to this statement from
John Clayton it should have been.


http://espn.go.com/nfl/columns/clayt...n/1354105.html


it the example setforth legit.. or is this his interpretation of the rule??

"A player will be ruled in bounds if he touches the pylon at the goal line before going out of bounds. For example, a pass would be considered complete if one foot touches the pylon and the other foot is in bounds."