I have no idea who's right and who is wrong. I am curious as well.. Should the play have been called a catch.. according to this statement from
John Clayton it should have been.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/columns/clayt...n/1354105.html
it the example setforth legit.. or is this his interpretation of the rule??
Quote:
|
"A player will be ruled in bounds if he touches the pylon at the goal line before going out of bounds. For example, a pass would be considered complete if one foot touches the pylon and the other foot is in bounds."
|