![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
NF #1. Bs coach is going to be ticked at the end of this one. First off, the muff is ignored since the hit on B88 caused him to come into contact with the ball. I take it you want not just KCI, but a PF on A77. Unless it is an elbow or something, I think we just have KCI even if he lays him out. Since you have a double foul it doesnt makes a difference if you call PF or KCI unless you think A77 should be disqualified for his actions. I guess you could call a multiple foul on A77 as well. If we do not have a double foul, unless you want to eject A77 or call multiple fouls, the better call for R is the KCI cuz then R can take an awarded fair catch if they want. If you do not eject A77 and call a PF instead of KCI, R would have to have the 15 yard PF penalty enforced from the PS and rekick. If the kick was poor, or if time is a major factor, R may want the awarded fair catch. We need to be discussing this before we make the penalty call. The foul on A77 and the running into the kicker will result in a double foul, then the USC will be enforced from succeeding spot (the PS) and it will be 1-10 for A at As 19. Bs coach will need an explanation and still be ticked off thinking you screwed it up. #2. I am going to give B56 some latitude in his running into unless it was VERY obvious a kick was going to be made. If you call B56 for running into kicker, then the ill batting by A3 will result in a double foul and you must have an untimed down. If you do not call a foul on B, then they will undoubtedly decline the foul by A and the game will go into overtime. NCAA: I do not think we have any differences, but I will be corrected if there are. |
Bookmarks |
|
|