The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 2004, 07:44pm
jjb jjb is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
NFHS football rules; resolving tied games. 5-1-2 2nd paragraph: " When the defensive team gains possession of the ball, the down and series immediately end for the offensive team" and 8-1: "If the defensive team scores a safety or touchdown,the game is ended"

After reading the interpetation 5.1.2A & 5.1.2B how can the defensive score a touchdown ?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 2004, 07:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 798
Very highly unlikely but....if A had committed a boat load of penalties and were somehow backed up to their own goal line and fumbled in the field of play and the ball was forced into their own endzone by their force and B fell on it, then it would be a TD for B.

In NJ rules, the ball doesn't become dead when B gets the ball on a turnover. It remains live and B could score which isn't far fetched.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 2004, 08:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally posted by ljudge
Very highly unlikely but....if A had committed a boat load of penalties and were somehow backed up to their own goal line and fumbled in the field of play and the ball was forced into their own endzone by their force and B fell on it, then it would be a TD for B.

In NJ rules, the ball doesn't become dead when B gets the ball on a turnover. It remains live and B could score which isn't far fetched.
Like he says, very highly unlikely! lol But you never know, it could happen so its gotta be in the ruleobok.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 10:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Highly unlikely, but if it wasn't in the book... what would you do when the son (grandson?) of Jim Marshall took the handoff and went 90 yards the wrong way for a safety?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 10:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: As ljudge said, here in NJ we use the NCAA procedure (1-10 from B's 25; B can score on a turnover). It's important to remember that each state can devise its own procedure for dealing with ties, including having no procedure at all if they so choose.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 04:43pm
jjb jjb is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
PA uses NFHS overtime rules. It would be more understandable if the rules book stated the defense could not advance a fumble or interception. One of the more respected members of my Association believes that a fumble or interception could be advanced as long as it didn't begin in the endzone. For example: B intercepts at the 3yl. 97 yard return and B gets 6 points. It's rare we have OT games. WH's usualy bring this up at halftime when a game looks like it might end in a tie.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 04:49pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by ljudge
Very highly unlikely but....if A had committed a boat load of penalties and were somehow backed up to their own goal line and fumbled in the field of play and the ball was forced into their own endzone by their force and B fell on it, then it would be a TD for B.

In NJ rules, the ball doesn't become dead when B gets the ball on a turnover. It remains live and B could score which isn't far fetched.
A fumbled ball in the field of play could be put into the end zone by a new force by B. B covers, it's a safety.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 30, 2004, 02:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 43
A fumbled ball in the field of play could be put into the end zone by a new force by B. B covers, it's a safety.

This play has always been one of my pet peeves in overtime, even though its not likely to happen. If B recovers this ball, while standing, he can try to advance it out of the endzone during regulation time. However if he recovers it in overtime its a safety even if he could physically advance it out of the endzone, since by rule its dead. Have always wanted the rule changed to "the ball being dead when B posesses it in the field of play." Or else use the same rules we do in regulation.

[Edited by WVREF on Oct 30th, 2004 at 03:43 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 01, 2004, 11:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by WVREF
A fumbled ball in the field of play could be put into the end zone by a new force by B. B covers, it's a safety.

This play has always been one of my pet peeves in overtime, even though its not likely to happen. If B recovers this ball, while standing, he can try to advance it out of the endzone during regulation time. However if he recovers it in overtime its a safety even if he could physically advance it out of the endzone, since by rule its dead. Have always wanted the rule changed to "the ball being dead when B posesses it in the field of play." Or else use the same rules we do in regulation.

[Edited by WVREF on Oct 30th, 2004 at 03:43 PM]
REPLY: I agree with you. Once B's force puts the ball into his end zone, he's pretty much dead...unless A fouls. Personally, I like the NCAA OT procedure which allows B to gain possession and play until the ball becomes dead by rule. More exciting and more like real-game situations.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 01, 2004, 11:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Sounds like in FED, B's only out is to "accidentally" put new force on the ball to get it out of the endzone without actually possessing it or illegally batting it.

Reason 135,263 of why I like our rules better than FED.... but that's just me.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 01, 2004, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Sounds like in FED, B's only out is to "accidentally" put new force on the ball to get it out of the endzone without actually possessing it or illegally batting it.

Reason 135,263 of why I like our rules better than FED.... but that's just me.
REPLY: It's not just you!
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 01, 2004, 08:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Highly unlikely, but if it wasn't in the book... what would you do when the son (grandson?) of Jim Marshall took the handoff and went 90 yards the wrong way for a safety?
I think his name is Corrigan.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 02, 2004, 09:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Jim Marshall's grandson's name is Corrigan?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 02, 2004, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Jim Marshall's grandson's name is Corrigan?
As in Douglas "Wrong-way" Corrigan, the pilot who flew from NY to Ireland claiming he got lost on his way to L.A.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1