The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 01, 2004, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alexandria, LA
Posts: 175
YES

Linemen cannot go beyond the expanded NZ until the last pass thrown goes beyond the NZ.

Ineligible downfield.
__________________
CW4 Paul Gilmore
Installation Food Advisor
Camp Beauregard
Alexandria, LA
Louisiana NG
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 03:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
What a bizarre rule. Let me ask 2 related questions then...

Lineman #59 receives a legal handoff, runs 5 yards past the LOS, returns back behind the LOS, and throws a pass. Illegal man downfield?

Lineman #59 receives a legal handoff, runs 5 yards past the LOS, pitches to QB #11, who immediately throws a pass. Illegal man downfield?
Yes and yes. Linemen cannot be down field until the last pass is thrown. Now having said that, when is the last time you saw a lineman receive a hand off??? Keep in mind, a lineman number cannot be a back in Fed.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 03:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1
...Keep in mind, a lineman number cannot be a back in Fed.
What rule prevents a player with a number 50-79 from being a back?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
I think if this is legal then it should be changed. You teach a DB to stay with a receiver until the ball crosses the line. Thanks for all your responses.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 02, 2004, 11:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally posted by bdavid48661
I think if this is legal then it should be changed. You teach a DB to stay with a receiver until the ball crosses the line. Thanks for all your responses.
It is legal! Like I said I've never seen or heard about it happening. So it's not that big of a deal. Guess you need to teach DB's to go back to the reciever when the ball goes back behind the LOS.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 03, 2004, 01:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
Quote:
Originally posted by BulldogMcC
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1
...Keep in mind, a lineman number cannot be a back in Fed.
What rule prevents a player with a number 50-79 from being a back?
look at the chart, I do believe it is in rule one (don't have my rule book handy). Also the answer on part 2 to that was false.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 03, 2004, 04:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
The rule that applies to numbering requirements is rule 7-5-6a.
The rule that applies to ineligibles is rule 7-5-12.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 03, 2004, 06:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 136
The rule that defines a back is 2-30-3 and it has nothing to do with numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 03, 2004, 08:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alexandria, LA
Posts: 175
Was he lined up as a running back?

If so, it was a legal handoff to a "runner". The fact that he was beyond the LOS when he tossed it back behind the LOS should not have any bearing on the ruling on this play. The lineman had been established as a runner, not a lineman.
__________________
CW4 Paul Gilmore
Installation Food Advisor
Camp Beauregard
Alexandria, LA
Louisiana NG
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 03, 2004, 08:54pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1
Quote:
Originally posted by BulldogMcC
Quote:
Originally posted by cowbyfan1
...Keep in mind, a lineman number cannot be a back in Fed.
What rule prevents a player with a number 50-79 from being a back?
look at the chart, I do believe it is in rule one (don't have my rule book handy). Also the answer on part 2 to that was false.
There is a difference between being a back and an eligible receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 05:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 182
McCrowder,

I'm talking about NCAA rules. I do not only imply that a QB can not cross the NZ, return behind it, and throw a legal forward pass; I'm in fact stating that that is a fact!

When re-reading the entire thread, it see that it is not clear that, except for my first post, I was talking about NCAA rules. Sorry about that.

[Edited by Dommer1 on Oct 4th, 2004 at 06:04 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 07:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
What a bizarre rule. Let me ask 2 related questions then...

Lineman #59 receives a legal handoff, runs 5 yards past the LOS, returns back behind the LOS, and throws a pass. Illegal man downfield?

Lineman #59 receives a legal handoff, runs 5 yards past the LOS, pitches to QB #11, who immediately throws a pass. Illegal man downfield?
In both cases I'm going to flag for ineligible downfield. The restrictions for A continue throughout the down until the last pass is thrown. The theory is that A knows the play and should know the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 09:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Thanks for the answer, Walt.

Dommer - I'm in Texas, so I'm under NCAA rules too. My hypothetical was to help me understand the Fed rules they were discussing.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 04, 2004, 09:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 80
Federation Rules. An ineligible numbered player may be lined up in the backfield and may block or receive a handoff or BACKWARD pass and run the ball. The player (say # 60) cannot receive a FORWARD pass or advance beyond the neutral zone during a forward pass play (untill the last pass crosses the neutral zone). A player in federation rules must be eligible by position and NUMBER (they CANNOT report to the referee with an ineligible number and make themselves legal). If this player advances beyond the neutral zone, he is guilty of ineligible receiver downfield and if he touches or catches the pass beyond the neutral zone, he is guilty of offensive pass interference. If he catches or muffs a FORWARD pass, in or behind the neutral zone, he is guilty of illegal touching. Just keep in mind no matter what position he starts the play in he still must have an eligible number to receive a forward pass.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1