The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 06:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 43
Send a message via AIM to TerpZebra
NFHS rules.

1st and 10 for Team A at their 20 yard line

A1 receives the snap and drops back to pass.

B1 holds A2 downfield at the 35 yard line.

A1 then runs the ball past the line of scrimmage to his own 25 yard line where he throws a backwards pass which is intercepted by B2 at the 23 and run back for a TD.


My thoughts: it is a running play because the backwards pass came after A1 crossed the line of scrimmage. B's TD will not count because they obtained the ball with dirty hands. The penalty should be enforced where the run ended (A's 25 yard line). A's ball, first and 10 at the 35 yard line. However, how do we know where the run ends? We do not bean bag a backward pass, etc. We have no reference to mark the penalty.

Your thoughts? And please include rule references, if available.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 06:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
Hopefully someone has bean bagged the spot of the turnover (23 yd. line) This should give a rather close proximity for addressing the actual spot of the end of the run.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 07:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
This is another example of why we need to bean bag things. If you were a yard or two off on the spot of the bean bag (23-25 yd line) you'd be ok since in either case the 10 yard penalty will give A a first down.

Always bean bag the end of a run that does not make the ball dead.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 08:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 463
Quote:
Originally posted by TerpZebra
... We do not bean bag a backward pass, etc.
Why not? You should. As your play illustrates, this is an important spot. Backward passes should be treated just like fumbles for bagging purposes - in fact, some crews use the bean bag as an indication that a pass is backward.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 08:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
I can only see bagging a backward pass if it is a fumble, which you should be doing any way and if it is intercepted by B.

Let me ask this how do you handle when B strips the ball away from A on A's run (change of possession). Would this be the spot indicating the end of the run for penalty enforcement if needed?

If you are saying bag change of possession do you bag interceptions of forward passes?
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!"
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 09:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
Interceptions are not an enforcment spot for Team-B, therefore no bag is needed nor should be dropped.

Backward passes beyond the NZ or when there is no NZ can and do become an enforcement spot for fouls that might occurr prior to said bkwd pass. That's why it is bagged. It is the end of the run spot for that foul.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 10:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 43
Send a message via AIM to TerpZebra
what happens on a Cal vs. Stanford type play...

ie, you have 5 or 6 backwards passes? got enough bean bags for that?

/tongue-in-cheek (slightly)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 07:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
So Theisey are you saying that we should be bagging the spot of every backward pass. Say an option play where the qb goes downfield and pitches back after gaining 10 yards to a trailing back. I know the ones that are dropped are bagged because they are fumbles.

I will be honest that I have never did that and nobody has told me that I should but you have gotten me to think twice about it now.

Anybody else's comments on this. Do you bag backward passes as well!?!?!?
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 461
Send a message via AIM to jumpmaster Send a message via MSN to jumpmaster Send a message via Yahoo to jumpmaster
not me, but...

This thread has got me thinking about it. I am curious as well. Anyone out there bag backwards passes?
__________________
Alan Roper

Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here - CPT John Parker, April 19, 1775, Lexington, Mass
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 08:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
Yes Bobo, that's what I'm saying.
I also must ammend my comment about a interception as a bag is necessary when "Momentum" in side the 5 yard line comes into play.

If that Cal-Stanford play were to occur again, there would be bags and hats all over the field. Possibly the mechanic was not in affect back when that play took place. After all, that as back in 1982.. and yes, there were five backward passes on that run.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 08:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
why beanbag??

Guys the reason for a beanbag is to mark the end of the run for penalty enforcement purposes, and for the momentum exceptions...backward passes are the end of a run, so yes I think they should be bagged...as far as option plays etc. technically no you don't need to bag them if they occur in the backfield, and if you read closely you don't need to bag fumbles or backward passes of any kind behind the NZ, the reason being that these are looseball plays and any penalty enforcement will be from the previous spot, so end of the run is not a factor...I still think it is a good habit to bag all fumbles but that is a personal decision I guess...
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
I see no need to use a beanbag on a backwards pass - it was simply intercepted, not fumbled.

A fumble is any loss of player possession other than by handing, PASSING, or legal kick.

So there would be no beanbag on the turnover.

2-18 for fumble.
2-22 for interception.

For those that beanbag backward passes - you are doing so unnecessarily.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
on the actual play that terpzebra outlined, you have a looseball play - not a running play - so therefore the spot is the previous spot. You would have A 1/10 at the 30.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
why is it a loose ball play

GeorgiaBlue, are you sure it is a loose ball play and if you are could you please explain why?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 23, 2004, 11:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Rule 2 section 1 article 3 of NFHS.

A loose ball is a pass, fumble or kick. A loose ball which has not yet touched the ground is in flight. A grounded loose ball is one which has touched the ground.

Notice it says NOTHING about forward or backward - behind or beyond the neutral zone.

So therefore it is a loose ball play - the qb 'passed' the ball backwards.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1