The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 24, 2004, 08:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
JimS.. I tend to disagree with your point that the rule is there to protect the snapper with his head down and once he lifts his head back up the protection is over. I tend to believe that the rule protects the snapper becuase of the unnatural position he is in having to deep snap and that he has no way to protect himself. He should be given protection until he can physically protect himself again. This requires not only lifting the head but also attaining an "athletic" stance over his feet. It is the responsibility of the defense not to charge into the snapper until this time, this is no different than the defense knowing that the ball is dead and to cease play. The nature of the rule implies there is a player that is in an unsafe situation. It is our responsibility to protect him, until he can protect himself.
I do agree that a once a "reasonable" amount of time has passed that he should have returned to an "athletic" position and protection is then discontinued.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1