The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 21, 2004, 09:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Ten seconds remain in the second period. A has the ball on B's 4. The clock is running. B encroaches before the snap.

The ball is set at the 2 yard line after enforcement of the penalty. The clock starts with the ready for play and time expires before A can snap the ball.

Should the period be extended for an untimed down?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 21, 2004, 09:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by waltjp

Should the period be extended for an untimed down?
No - the only time you have an untimed down is when the foul occurs during the last down of a quarter itself. Because there was no snap, the down has not started.

If, however, you believe this is an attempt by B to illegally run out the clock, you can start the clock on the snap rather than on the ready.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 21, 2004, 09:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Thanks. That's the way I was leaning but it did spark a bit of a debate.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 21, 2004, 10:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 86
Unhappy

Sorry guys, wrong answer. I had this last Friday night at the end of the first quarter and after looking it up, I found that I had kicked it.

Case book 3.3.3 Situation C: Near the end of the third period, it is third and 4 for A from B's 48-yard line. A1 advances to B's 45 and during the run there is holding by B1. The penalty is accepted. At the end of the down, there are three seconds remaining in the period. Because the penalty was the only reason for the clock to be stopped, it is started with the ready-for-play signal and the period ends before A snaps the ball.

Ruling: A is entitled to an untimed down becuase it accepted the penalty for a foul which occured during the last timed down of the period. Therefore, the period must be exstended with an untimed down in this situation even though time remained and A had a chance to snap the ball before time expired.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 21, 2004, 10:49pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by waltjp

Should the period be extended for an untimed down?
No - the only time you have an untimed down is when the foul occurs during the last down of a quarter itself. Because there was no snap, the down has not started.

If, however, you believe this is an attempt by B to illegally run out the clock, you can start the clock on the snap rather than on the ready.
Like has been said, in NFHS this is wrong.

When the clock runs out, blow the whistle and give the time-out signal. Then call for one untimed down and run it.

In NFHS the last down cannot contain an accepted penalty.

--Rich
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 04:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
But an encroachment is a dead ball foul and not during the last TIMED down. In this case it was not a timed down as the down would begin with the snap. Fed in rule 3-3-3 highlights timed.
They also point out that if time ran out during a sucessful field goal or if it was out during a try, and the kicking teams accepts a suceeding spot enforcement, then the period is not extended.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 06:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally posted by Axe Man

Case book 3.3.3 Situation C: Near the end of the third period, it is third and 4 for A from B's 48-yard line. A1 advances to B's 45 and during the run there is holding by B1. The penalty is accepted. At the end of the down, there are three seconds remaining in the period. Because the penalty was the only reason for the clock to be stopped, it is started with the ready-for-play signal and the period ends before A snaps the ball.
The difference here from my situation is live ball vs. dead ball foul. The encroachment is a dead ball foul.

I remembered this case book play and immediately thought untimed down, but after thinking it over I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: Mark had it right in his response. The period is not extended in this case since the foul did not occur during the last timed down. And it is within the R's discretion to use NF 3-6-3 to start the clock on the snap if he believes that B's encroachment was an attempt to illegally consume time.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 22, 2004, 12:38pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by waltjp

Should the period be extended for an untimed down?
No - the only time you have an untimed down is when the foul occurs during the last down of a quarter itself. Because there was no snap, the down has not started.

If, however, you believe this is an attempt by B to illegally run out the clock, you can start the clock on the snap rather than on the ready.
Like has been said, in NFHS this is wrong.

When the clock runs out, blow the whistle and give the time-out signal. Then call for one untimed down and run it.

In NFHS the last down cannot contain an accepted penalty.

--Rich
Whoops. Reading is fundamental. I saw the case play and immediately forgot that the OP posted a DEAD ball foul.

Mark is right. Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1