The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 12:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 45
Pass interference can be a hard call to make. What one official may call as PI, another official may not call as PI. Does anyone have a good rule of thumb on what they look for in calling PI?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 12:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
Well, i look for any contact between a potential pass reciever and his defender.

If I see contact, that puts one of the two players at a disadvantage, I throw my flag.

If the ball was not catchable, I am relying on one of the other officials to make me aware of this, because if the ball was clearly not catchable we will pick up the flag.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 01:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 235
Uncatchable ball still applies.

Quote:
Originally posted by ref18
Well, i look for any contact between a potential pass reciever and his defender.

If I see contact, that puts one of the two players at a disadvantage, I throw my flag.

If the ball was not catchable, I am relying on one of the other officials to make me aware of this, because if the ball was clearly not catchable we will pick up the flag.
The catchable pass only applies to NCAA games. At the FED level you still can throw the flag. Now you should use common sense and only throw a flag if the ball is thrown to a certain side of the field.

My guideline is to let contact take place until someone is put at an advantage. If they are chicken fighting with their hands I will just let it go. When one of the players pushes off or gets separation then that is a good time for a flag. The NCAA has a great tape with PI type plays. I would suggest that you probably get that to see what is acceptable. It still can apply to NF rules except for the uncatchable pass plays. This is really a hard rule to talk about.
__________________
Treat everyone as you would like to be treated.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 02:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 842
Send a message via AIM to cowbyfan1 Send a message via Yahoo to cowbyfan1
I agree, I look for an advantage gained. Alos pass has to be to the receiver unless there is another receiver in the general area getting mugged that you obviously have to call something.

Remember if both players are going for the ball it is not a PI unless someone is pushing off at same time.
__________________
Jim

Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 11:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
Re: Uncatchable ball still applies.

Quote:
Originally posted by PS2Man
Quote:
Originally posted by ref18
Well, i look for any contact between a potential pass reciever and his defender.

If I see contact, that puts one of the two players at a disadvantage, I throw my flag.

If the ball was not catchable, I am relying on one of the other officials to make me aware of this, because if the ball was clearly not catchable we will pick up the flag.
The catchable pass only applies to NCAA games. At the FED level you still can throw the flag. Now you should use common sense and only throw a flag if the ball is thrown to a certain side of the field.

One thing I forgot to mention, my ruling was based on the Canadian rules, which state that a pass must be catchable for PI to be called.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 05:51pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally posted by bjudge
Pass interference can be a hard call to make. What one official may call as PI, another official may not call as PI. Does anyone have a good rule of thumb on what they look for in calling PI?
Whenever I see 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081 28481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381 96442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190 91456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412 73724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364 36789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160 94330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185 48074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949 12, I rule this as PI.

No, wait, that is pi, not PI. Oh d@mn, this new math stuff.........




For the Canadian Ruling, what ref18 said.

[Edited by JugglingReferee on Aug 27th, 2004 at 06:55 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 05:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally posted by JugglingReferee

Whenever I see 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081 28481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381 96442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190 91456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412 73724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364 36789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160 94330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185 48074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949 12, I rule this as PI.

No, wait, that is pi, not PI. Oh d@mn, this new math stuff.........




For the Canadian Ruling, what ref18 said.

[Edited by JugglingReferee on Aug 27th, 2004 at 06:55 PM]
How many decimal places did you get it to??
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 27, 2004, 09:40pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally posted by ref18
Quote:
Originally posted by JugglingReferee

Whenever I see 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081 28481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381 96442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190 91456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412 73724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364 36789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160 94330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185 48074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949 12, I rule this as PI.

No, wait, that is pi, not PI. Oh d@mn, this new math stuff.........




For the Canadian Ruling, what ref18 said.

[Edited by JugglingReferee on Aug 27th, 2004 at 06:55 PM]
How many decimal places did you get it to??
Ya gotta count 'em!! And no using cutting and pasting into Word, then using the character count feature!

LOL - 500.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1