Quote:
Originally posted by bjudge
Pass interference can be a hard call to make. What one official may call as PI, another official may not call as PI. Does anyone have a good rule of thumb on what they look for in calling PI?
|
Whenever I see 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081 28481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381 96442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190 91456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412 73724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364 36789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160 94330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185 48074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949 12, I rule this as PI.
No, wait, that is pi, not PI. Oh d@mn, this new math stuff.........
For the Canadian Ruling, what ref18 said.
[Edited by JugglingReferee on Aug 27th, 2004 at 06:55 PM]