![]() |
great officiating
I thought the officiating was great with the one exception of the Muhammad fumble/incomplete pass call. Otherwise, great game!
|
Wasn't JJ in violation of the no metal jewelry protruding from the uniform rule and how did the officials miss it during the pregame inspections?
|
Bob, I agree, excellent calls for incomplete, I too thought that the official was screened out but he came running in with an incomplete signal, nice job.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Another consideration, was the ball thrown beyond the LOS? Also, it would be have to be an exceptional play for a wing to throw a flag for intentional grounding. Consulting with the R to determine if there was an eligible receiver in the area - YES; tossing a flag - NO! |
REPLY: JMN, the NFL's rule on ineligibles downfield is pretty much the same as the Fed's and the NCAA's except that it also applies to passes which do <u>not</u> cross the NZ. But as far as the guy being beyond and then coming back, tough luck! He was downfield. That's what I was trying to say in my post (maybe not well enough). The HL got it right. I agree that it would be highly unusual for a wing to throw for intentional grounding (probably because Hochuli would have strangled him!), but for the HL flagging ineligibles, seven-man crew mechanics call for the HL and LJ to stay put on the LOS until the pass is thrown. Even though ineigibles downfield is the primary responsibility of the U, the HL and LJ will be keying the closest ineligible to them. So they might very well catch an ineligible downfield.
[Edited by Bob M. on Feb 3rd, 2004 at 04:59 PM] |
Quote:
What a great speaker. He often said, "that's what it is." He'd describe something, comment on it and then say, "that's what it is." I heard it so many times, he could have convinced me that pink is blue as long as he said "that's what it is" afterwards. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31am. |