|
|
|
Wed Jan 14, 2004, 01:49am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Typical of the FED. Make a new rule (8-2-2), include a provision for special enforcement (10-5-1f), make its intent perfectly clear in the "Comments on the 2003 Rules Revisions" (pg. 73), ADD a casebook ruling (10.5.3 - item 9 on the very same web page), then contradict it with an "interpretation" that is completely contrary to intent AND is published and changed after the season starts. Is Dick Schindler back?
Thanks for pointing that out. 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
