![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
That is possible, but very unlikely. It seems weird that NFHS wants games to end in such improbable fashion, but perhaps they want to give both teams a chance on offense and defense. But then NFHS logic is different from common sense logic
.
|
|
|||
|
I don't think the rule reflects any NFHS desire for a game to end in any fashion but rather an acknowledgement that it is possible for the defense to gain possession of a live ball in the offenses end zone and that a touchdown in such a situation would eliminate the need for the defensive team that just scored to take a turn on offense. The only way around this would be to contradict the definition of a touchdown, which is possession of a live ball in your opponent's end zone.
Ultimately I think it is a measure to account for something that could happen, however improbable, and if it were to happen reward the team that scored as it feels is consistent with the rules.
__________________
My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Overtime | rottiron01 | Basketball | 35 | Tue Jun 23, 2009 02:32pm |
| Overtime | mj | Football | 14 | Tue Sep 18, 2007 03:20pm |
| NFHS Overtime TOs | DJ_NV | Football | 10 | Fri Aug 11, 2006 08:18am |
| Overtime-NFHS | devdog69 | Football | 36 | Tue Jul 26, 2005 09:16am |
| Overtime | Just Curious | Basketball | 10 | Mon Feb 12, 2001 12:56pm |