The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 09, 2016, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
IMO, #1 & #3 are easy.

I have a problem with #2, however. The defensive player had already committed before the slide began, and was indeed trying to tackle in the "hit zone". If the QB had stayed upright, it would have been a legal tackle.
I agree with both considerations; the defender's commitment BEFORE the runner changed his profile, and the fact the runner, dramatically, changed his target profile. Although, it wouldn't be a bad idea for the Minnesota coaching staff to hold a really in-depth discussion about the "Targeting" rule with the ENTIRE team.

Last edited by ajmc; Fri Sep 09, 2016 at 08:38am.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video Req - Michigan State/Minnesota - PC/Block/Flop MechanicGuy Basketball 0 Sat Jan 02, 2016 04:44pm
Minnesota and Texas Tech flagrant 1 video request. Sharpshooternes Basketball 8 Mon Nov 23, 2015 08:34am
Chicago vs. Minnesota ejection video request TriggerMN Football 13 Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:03pm
Video Request: Indiana at Minnesota JRutledge Basketball 15 Fri Mar 01, 2013 07:47am
Minnesota JeffRobinson Basketball 0 Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1