Pac-12 suspends line judge for inadvertent whistle ruling

[Suudy]

Originally Posted by BoomerSooner

It is as simple as 2 statements:
1. From the conference office: "We have evaluated the performance of the officiating crews from all of our games over the past weekend. These evaluations have been reviewed with the crews as part of our continual performance improvement process. Where needed we have made recommendations for improvement, but we remain confident in the quality of our officials."
2. From the school(s) involved: "We have been in contact with the conference office regarding the officiating from this past weekend. We are disappointed with the outcome of the game and have discussed several items that concerned us. The conference has reviewed these items, shared their findings with us, and reviewed the steps taken to assure continual improvement surrounding these areas. We appreciate their attention to the matter and support the conference's efforts."

If you don't do PR for a living, you should.

[Canned Heat]

Originally Posted by Suudy

If you don't do PR for a living, you should.

I agree.....I also concur with others on how the NFL could better handle their internal matters on similar events, as well.

We are slowly regressing back to the days of heads on a stick in the town square. "Reparations!" as George Costanza would say.

[ajmc]

At some point, hopefully very soon, rational people are going to stop overreacting to the whining of those who are offended, put off, demand attention to every little infraction (real or imagined) they (and usually ONLY they) feel slighted about.

Like any other bad behavior, the more attention paid to unnecessary whining only serves to increase the volume of unnecessary whining you'll need to deal with.

Football would be a great place to start.