The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 26, 2015, 06:10pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,404
Hey, It Works For Hockey ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpgc99 View Post
To me this just seems like change for the sake of change, with no real purpose.
How about three fifteen-minute periods. To make extra money, the home team can sell advertising on the Zamboni.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 26, 2015, 07:19pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Personally, I love it. Name one thing about this that is negative from an official's standpoint OTHER than playing 4 extra minutes per game.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 26, 2015, 08:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Personally, I love it. Name one thing about this that is negative from an official's standpoint OTHER than playing 4 extra minutes per game.
From an officiating perspective, I like it too. Mostly just because we essentially get rid of two timeouts. I just don't see any benefit to the game in general, and thus no reason for the state to make this change.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 26, 2015, 10:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Playing quarters instead of halves in basketball at any level has never made sense. At least in the NBA, they have certain foul rules tied to the quarters. The presence of quarters means the game is harder to play and officiate. There are 4 potential last second shots to rule on, and 4 times to "play" for the last shot. The latter interrupts the normal flow of the game. Plus, in a game with either a good flow or a wide margin, there's likely no need for what would be the 3rd quarter TO.

I have had a game where we've had 3 buzzer beater shots. I think we got them all right, but at least 2 of them might have gone to replay if we were in a college game.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Name one thing about this that is negative from an official's standpoint OTHER than playing 4 extra minutes per game.
Here are two: more fouls, more free throws.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 29, 2015, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Personally, I love it. Name one thing about this that is negative from an official's standpoint OTHER than playing 4 extra minutes per game.
Sometimes when officiating small schools without depth, the middle of the first half often gets very disjointed. Kids could use the break but coaches seem wary of using their timeouts for this reason.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wisconsin vs Iowa cmhjordan23 Basketball 34 Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:45pm
Wisconsin/PSU Rich Basketball 1 Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:22am
Iowa-Wisconsin - IW bisonlj Football 9 Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:21pm
Wisconsin v WSU Game Suudy Football 4 Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:46am
Wisconsin LDUB Baseball 5 Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1