The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 18, 2015, 12:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
There are a few things contributing to the NBA's traveling problem:
1. The League is about making money and believes that offense sells tickets and attracts TV viewership, which equates to advertising $ and TV contract revenue. The NBA does not want the high-flying dunks and spin-moves negated by traveling calls from the officials because the offensive player used illegal footwork in making the crowd-pleasing play. This is the mentality which it has bred into its fans and is now a victim of its own creation. It will be very difficult to get people to accept strict policing of footwork as occurred 40 years ago.

2. The athletes are amazing physical specimens. They are HUGE men who are agile, strong, and quick. Therefore, the speed of play is quite fast and it can be difficult for the officials to discern the footwork even when in the proper position, but it seems that more frequently the issue is that the sightlines become blocked by other players. At the NCAA tournament this year an NBA scout told me that the biggest difference between the pro and college game was how much the NBA players shrink the floor. They are so big, long, and fast that the amount of time and space which offensive players have to operate is greatly lessened. The only practical solution is to enlarge the playing court. This would spread the players out more and provide better views for the officials.

3. The language of the NBA traveling rule is vague and unclear. There is something about a two-count rhythm being permitted after catching the ball. I have no idea what that means and I've officiated HS and college. Is that steps, seconds, heartbeats, times a shoe may contact the floor (same foot or both feet)? I truly believe that the fans, players, and officials are unsure about the rule because of this language. Therefore officials have to allow questionable footwork in catching the ball at the end of a dribble or when receiving a pass while in motion. They just aren't certain what is illegal and should be penalized. This text needs to be rewritten. I would prefer seeing the language used by FIBA or the NCAA. In any case the rules for traveling need to be consistent throughout HS, college, and the professional ranks. This would permit players and officials to develop familiarity with proper footwork as they advance up the levels of competition.
Note that I purposely criticized a blatant traveling violation from a playoff game which did NOT involve a player just receiving the ball, but one in which he already had it, in an attempt to avoid the argument that the NBA traveling rule is different (from HS, college, and FIBA).

4. The players are valuable commodities to the teams and the league. They make large salaries and protecting them from injury is a high priority. That mandates that the officials concentrate on contact first and illegal footwork thereafter. Also coaches, players, and TV announcers complain about illegal contact frequently, but harp on traveling much less. Thus the focus of the officials is going to be on the area for which these people express more concern. Curiously, if the footwork were required to be more precise the game would effectively be slowed down as players in possession of the ball couldn't get a running start or gain extra speed from an additional step and the collisions would be lessened and not as severe, resulting in better player safety.

The NBA could consider going to four officials instead of three as hockey did several years ago. This would permit the officials to already be places and not have to be moving along with the players in an attempt to achieve a better angle from which to call plays. Calls are mostly missed during rotations and while officials are moving. The extra person would allow more "divide and conquer" techniques to be used by officials both in areas of court coverage as well as observing the different body parts of the players. It's not possible to closely look for fouls on the head and arms of 7-foot men jumping high into the air and simultaneously observe their feet. The issue is the same whether the action is a contested dunk attempt at the rim or a 3-pt shot. One officials can't watch both high and low, so two officials must be observing this action and when two officials can't physically get in position to see these plays there is a low chance of them being called fully correctly. The single official who can see it must prioritize what to look for, and that default is contact first, footwork last.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Mon May 18, 2015 at 12:07pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 30, 2015, 11:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
3. The language of the NBA traveling rule is vague and unclear. There is something about a two-count rhythm being permitted after catching the ball. I have no idea what that means and I've officiated HS and college. Is that steps, seconds, heartbeats, times a shoe may contact the floor (same foot or both feet)? I truly believe that the fans, players, and officials are unsure about the rule because of this language. Therefore officials have to allow questionable footwork in catching the ball at the end of a dribble or when receiving a pass while in motion. They just aren't certain what is illegal and should be penalized. This text needs to be rewritten. I would prefer seeing the language used by FIBA or the NCAA. In any case the rules for traveling need to be consistent throughout HS, college, and the professional ranks. This would permit players and officials to develop familiarity with proper footwork as they advance up the levels of competition.
Note that I purposely criticized a blatant traveling violation from a playoff game which did NOT involve a player just receiving the ball, but one in which he already had it, in an attempt to avoid the argument that the NBA traveling rule is different (from HS, college, and FIBA).
Here's the NBA travel rule as written in this year's rule book. I really don't see anything vague or unclear. There are terms we don't use but it's a different game from ours. As has been said, the rule is different from NF and NCAA though a lot of things are the same.

As for being the same from HS up to the pro level, why? They're better than HS and college players and they're also entertainers. If you think no one goes to a HS or college game to see officials call traveling that's really the case in an NBA game. Again, better to miss some travels than miss some fouls.

Quote:
Section XIII—Traveling
a. A player who receives the ball while standing still may pivot, using either foot as the pivot foot.
b. A player who receives the ball while he is progressing or upon completion of a dribble, may take two steps in coming to a stop, passing or shooting the ball.
A player who receives the ball while he is progressing must release the ball to start his dribble before his second step.
The first step occurs when a foot, or both feet, touch the floor after gaining control of the ball.
The second step occurs after the first step when the other foot touches the floor, or both feet touch the floor simultaneously.
A player who comes to a stop on step one when both feet are on the floor or touch the floor simultaneously may pivot using either foot as his pivot. If he jumps with both feet he must release the ball before either foot touches the floor.
A player who lands with one foot first may only pivot using that foot.
A progressing player who jumps off one foot on the first step may land with both feet simultaneously for the second step. In this situation, the player may not pivot with either foot and if one or both feet leave the floor the ball must be released before either returns to the floor.
c. In starting a dribble after (1) receiving the ball while standing still, or (2) coming to a legal stop, the ball must be out of the player’s hand before the pivot foot is raised off the floor.
d. If a player, with the ball in his possession, raises his pivot foot off the floor, he must pass or shoot before his pivot foot returns to the floor. If he drops the ball while in the air, he may not be the first to touch the ball.
e. A player who falls to the floor while holding the ball, or while coming to a stop, may not gain an advantage by sliding.
f. A player who attempts a field goal may not be the first to touch the ball if it fails to touch the backboard, basket ring or another player.
g. A player may not be the first to touch his own pass unless the ball touches his backboard, basket ring or another player.
h. Upon ending his dribble or gaining control of the ball, a player may not touch the floor consecutively with the same foot (hop).
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deadspin: It's not traveling unless Duke says it's traveling Rich Basketball 1 Mon Feb 23, 2009 09:21pm
Is this traveling? DKaiser Basketball 2 Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:04pm
Traveling Dave Dow Basketball 26 Mon Jan 08, 2007 09:43am
Traveling or nothing! VaCoach Basketball 17 Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:12pm
traveling? ctpfive Basketball 15 Sun Jan 30, 2005 03:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1