Notre Dame/Clemson (Video)

[JRutledge]

Play #1: That looks like a violation. I saw no change of direction of the pass or any slowing down of the pass. I like the way the T took his time to make sure no one else had something.

Play #2: Not even close. The Clemson player has the right to look at someone that is sliding at his feet. If anything that might be a talk to if you think there was any attempt to taunt, but I would not call a T just for that action.

Play#3: Foul on #32 Dark who took out the White player by sliding into his legs. The White player had position to make a play on the ball until he was contacted by #32.

Peace

[Raymond]

1) late but right...not a big deal to me

2) absolutely nothing

3) foul

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

1) late but right...not a big deal to me

2) absolutely nothing

3) foul

Yep.

[deecee]

1. Late, but I have done this too. I look to my partner to see if they had a tip or not.
2. nothing
3. foul.

[so cal lurker]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Play #1: That looks like a violation. I saw no change of direction of the pass or any slowing down of the pass. I like the way the T took his time to make sure no one else had something.

Looked to me like he looked at his partner to make sure the partner wasn't signaling tip before hitting the whistle.

[Thumper68]

1. Correct. I think is looking at the "c" for a tipped ball signal.
2. Nothing
3. Foul

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

[APG]

Originally Posted by Thumper68

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

Absolutely not

[johnny d]

Originally Posted by thumper68

on the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

no

Originally Posted by Thumper68

On the initial shot before #3, look at the rebounding action on the lane line table side. Blue #22 holding? Intentional for fed rule set?

Could be holding, no way that's an INT though.

[j51969]

[QUOTE=Thumper68;955197]1. Correct. I think is looking at the "c" for a tipped ball signal.

+1

I don't believe it was late at all. He was clearly looking for imformation before he make a call. Wierd angle and the C may have seen something he didn't. Once the C had nothing he put air in it.

[Zoochy]

Play #3
I had similar play where I called a foul. Coach comments "That can't be a foul. He was going for the ball!"
Coaches say funny things.

[La Rikardo]

Originally Posted by Zoochy

Play #3
I had similar play where I called a foul. Coach comments "That can't be a foul. He was going for the ball!"
Coaches say funny things.

We hear that line in soccer every single game.

Originally Posted by La Rikardo

We hear that line in soccer every single game.

Probably cuz at the highest levels of soccer, getting any of the ball means 99% of the time there wasn't a foul.