Personal T ot Team T

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BigCat

The repeated boundary violation technical is contained in the team technical area and again in the PLAYER technical area. says player gets a T for repeted violations of boundary plane etc. If A1 breaks the plane and team is warned, then A2 does it. it is a team technical not a player technical. however, if the first plane violation was by A1 and then A1 did it again later in game he would be charged with a T (player). the player gets the T if he does it repeatedly. the team gets it if different players do it.

i read it this way because repeated violations of plane is listed in Player technical area as well as team area. if it was never charged to a player it wouldnt be there and say it. thx

That isn't what is meant by that rule. DOG warnings don't include reporting it against a players. As such, there is no way technically hold a player responsible for a DOG warning given 2 quarters back.

What this rule intends to address is a player who keeps crossing the throwin line, likely deliberately, over and over on back-to-back throwins, making a mockery of the game.

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That isn't what is meant by that rule. DOG warnings don't include reporting it against a players. As such, there is no way technically hold a player responsible for a DOG warning given 2 quarters back.

What this rule intends to address is a player who keeps crossing the throwin line, likely deliberately, over and over on back-to-back throwins, making a mockery of the game.

i'm just reading a player technical rule. it says repeated violations of boundary plane = player technical. when i see that--that tells me i need to be aware which player violates the plane when it happens. because if he repeats it, their rule says player technical. it just so happens that the first time it is done it is considered a team warning for delay. there isnt any time limitation or back to back wording in the player technical area. (mockery etc)

again, im just reading the rule. if i saw an interp or case play i could infer nfhs intent etc differently. right now i see repeated violations by a player = T. let me know if there is an interp.thx

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BigCat

i'm just reading a player technical rule. it says repeated violations of boundary plane = player technical. when i see that--that tells me i need to be aware which player violates the plane when it happens. because if he repeats it, their rule says player technical. it just so happens that the first time it is done it is considered a team warning for delay. there isnt any time limitation or back to back wording in the player technical area. (mockery etc)

again, im just reading the rule. if i saw an interp or case play i could infer nfhs intent etc differently. right now i see repeated violations by a player = T. let me know if there is an interp.thx

Two isn't enough to consider it "repeated" here. We never record the number of the player who causes the first warning, so there's no way to track this. I would advise you against doing it the way you suggest.

Most of us will go our entire career without having to enforce this particular rule.

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Adam

Two isn't enough to consider it "repeated" here. We never record the number of the player who causes the first warning, so there's no way to track this. I would advise you against doing it the way you suggest.

Most of us will go our entire career without having to enforce this particular rule.

i've never enforced the rule. being the rocket scientist i am, i decided to look in the case book. exact play is in case book 10.1.5 E situation A. B1 does it early and again late. they say only a team tech….sharp as a marble on that one...

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BigCat

i'm just reading a player technical rule. it says repeated violations of boundary plane = player technical. when i see that--that tells me i need to be aware which player violates the plane when it happens. because if he repeats it, their rule says player technical. it just so happens that the first time it is done it is considered a team warning for delay. there isnt any time limitation or back to back wording in the player technical area. (mockery etc)

again, im just reading the rule. if i saw an interp or case play i could infer nfhs intent etc differently. right now i see repeated violations by a player = T. let me know if there is an interp.thx

What everyone in this thread is telling you and what you also seem to have realized is that you don't understand the purpose and intent of that player technical rule.
The best advice is to stay away from enforcing rules that you don't understand.