The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Definite Knowledge? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/99078-definite-knowledge.html)

That Guy Sat Jan 17, 2015 03:16pm

Definite Knowledge?
 
From a coach friend of mine:

MS game (not that it matters in this one):
A down by 1, 6 seconds left, H ball in the backcourt following a timeout.

A brings the ball up court, several passes are made before they end up with a layup to win the game at the buzzer.

As the R consults with the timer to confirm whether it was released in time, the timer informs the R that she hadn't stopped the clock quickly enough before the timeout, so she made up for it by holding for a moment before starting when the official chopped in time on the throw-in.

Officials confer, and determine they now have definite knowledge of a timing error and wave off the basket. Game over, B wins.

Were the officials correct?

mutantducky Sat Jan 17, 2015 03:53pm

that sucks. It is penalizing the team that may have scored had the timing been right. Maybe they would have gotten the shot off sooner.
Yes I think they were correct. But certainly not a way you'd want to finish a game. I don't think there is any way to restart it, and have them go again? Not a correctable error.

BillyMac Sat Jan 17, 2015 03:58pm

It's Too Late Baby Now It's Too Late (Carole King, 1971) ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy (Post 950707)
Were the officials correct?

No. They would have been correct if they spotted the timing error at the time it occurred (before the timeout), and had the definite knowledge to fix it, but it's too late at this time to fix it.

mutantducky Sat Jan 17, 2015 04:02pm

So, same situation but instead of a moment, let's say the clock doesn't start for 2 seconds. The refs know for sure the shot would have been late. But because it came before the buzzer you would still count the basket because the refs didn't notice the problem until after? I'm also thinking about hometown cooking, with the clock person being biased.

Adam Sat Jan 17, 2015 04:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mutantducky (Post 950710)
So, same situation but instead of a moment, let's say the clock doesn't start for 2 seconds. The refs know for sure the shot would have been late. But because it came before the buzzer you would still count the basket because the refs didn't notice the problem until after? I'm also thinking about hometown cooking, with the clock person being biased.

If one of the officials had a count going, he should have killed it when he got to 6. If he didn't have a count going, you can't just do this because you know it would have been late. Without a count, you've got nothing here.

For me, with 6 seconds to go, I always have a count. If I get to two and the clock hasn't moved, I'm stopping the game, resettin the clock to 4 seconds, and adminstering a new throw-in from the POI.

Camron Rust Sat Jan 17, 2015 05:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 950713)
If one of the officials had a count going, he should have killed it when he got to 6. If he didn't have a count going, you can't just do this because you know it would have been late. Without a count, you've got nothing here.

For me, with 6 seconds to go, I always have a count. If I get to two and the clock hasn't moved, I'm stopping the game, resettin the clock to 4 seconds, and adminstering a new throw-in from the POI.

Agree. The official should stop it immediately when they see the clock not starting. It is unfair to the team to let it play down to 2 or 1 and declare the game over when they are expecting to have 1 or 2 more seconds to get to their shot.

Counting down to some point and declaring the game over would be the wrong game management decision.

mutantducky Sat Jan 17, 2015 05:21pm

Ok cool, will keep that in mind. End of game situations do a count, if possible quick glance at clock and see if things are lined up.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Sat Jan 17, 2015 06:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 950709)
No. They would have been correct if they spotted the timing error at the time it occurred (before the timeout), and had the definite knowledge to fix it, but it's too late at this time to fix it.


Bill:

Carole King, ;). I love the reference. Boy, we are getting old. LOL!

MTD, Sr.

Kelvin green Sat Jan 17, 2015 07:50pm

why is the R conferring with the timer to determine if final shot is good? Mistake

The clock running after time out called and not picking it up. Mistake

The clock being held and not starting and not knowing it, Mistake

Taking away the basket with out definite knowledge. Mistake.

If they did not correct the time running after the time out, it's too late... They did not have definte knowledge of the time...

One mistake should not be compounded into multiple mistakes.....

Nevadaref Sat Jan 17, 2015 07:56pm

The timer shouldn't be making decisions about how to fix timing mistakes.
Since the home timer incorrectly gave the home team more time to score, there is justice in the fact that the basket was nullified.

La Rikardo Sat Jan 17, 2015 08:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy (Post 950707)
From a coach friend of mine:

MS game (not that it matters in this one):
A down by 1, 6 seconds left, H ball in the backcourt following a timeout.

A brings the ball up court, several passes are made before they end up with a layup to win the game at the buzzer.

As the R consults with the timer to confirm whether it was released in time, the timer informs the R that she hadn't stopped the clock quickly enough before the timeout, so she made up for it by holding for a moment before starting when the official chopped in time on the throw-in.

Officials confer, and determine they now have definite knowledge of a timing error and wave off the basket. Game over, B wins.

Were the officials correct?

If no official has definite knowledge regarding the time, the goal must count. Regardless of whether the timer made a mistake, the time on the clock is all that matters unless an official has definite knowledge of what the time should be.

Nevadaref Sat Jan 17, 2015 08:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Rikardo (Post 950732)
If no official has definite knowledge regarding the time, the goal must count. Regardless of whether the timer made a mistake, the time on the clock is all that matters unless an official has definite knowledge of what the time should be.

Definite knowledge may be obtained by consulting with the timer. Since that was done here with the timer stating that she purposely didn't start the clock for a couple of seconds, if the officials know that the basket was scored in the final two seconds, canceling the goal would be proper.

bob jenkins Sat Jan 17, 2015 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mutantducky (Post 950717)
Ok cool, will keep that in mind. End of game situations do a count, if possible quick glance at clock and see if things are lined up.

It's always possible for one of the two (or three) officials to glance at the clock.

just another ref Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 950733)
Definite knowledge may be obtained by consulting with the timer. Since that was done here with the timer stating that she purposely didn't start the clock for a couple of seconds, if the officials know that the basket was scored in the final two seconds, canceling the goal would be proper.



No certain number of seconds was mentioned in the OP. And even if it had been, it is highly unlikely that the amount of time involved in the late stoppage was anything other than a guess. That would eliminate the possibility of the timer's overall adjustments, or lack thereof, as being anything definite.

mutantducky Sun Jan 18, 2015 01:46am

check out this video. That's an interesting call by the refs...

http://www.maxpreps.com/blogs/maxwir...ck-mistake.htm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1