|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Eastern Michigan-Michigan Backcourt Violation? (Video)
Last 10 seconds of the game. Michigan has team control in the front court. Team control is never lost, Michigan is last to touch in the frontcourt and first to touch in the backcourt. Why isn't this play a backcourt violation?
|
|
|||
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Because Michigan was not the last to touch.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
The last angle pretty clearly shows that EMU touched the ball last in the frontcourt, but that's tough to see from the main angle and probably tough to see if you're C. Even so, if C isn't planning to call the potential violation, he's got to give the tip signal. Otherwise he looks like he has no clue.
|
|
|||
So, is the "tip signal" required, or optional/additional, at the NCAA level?
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
It looks like a good no-call.
It certainly was not obvious that Michigan touched the ball last. I would rather call this like anything when it is obvious. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
I'm not seeing a bat by Michigan. I'm seeing the EMU player try to grab the ball from the Michigan player's hands but failing to gain control himself and sending the ball into the Michigan backcourt. But from the original angle I'd have no idea who touched it last, and that angle isn't too different from C's look.
|
|
|||
From the video, i can't tell, with any degree of certainty, who touched it last. Must go with the call/non-call as made.
There was a time where green clearly touched it but there was a moment just after that where gold may or may not have touched it....can't tell.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
And just for discussion sake, if emu does gain possession (posession change) briefly and then the ball gets popped out by michigan into the BC it would also not be a BC. Must be aware of shot clock and a reset or not.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Michigan at MSU (Video) | JRutledge | Basketball | 13 | Fri Feb 06, 2015 02:11pm |
Texas/Michigan St. Backcourt | OKREF | Basketball | 1 | Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:29am |
Video Request: Michigan/Duke, Throw-In Violation, Coach K "T" (Clip Added) | bainsey | Basketball | 22 | Fri Dec 06, 2013 08:57am |
Video Request: Michigan v. Florida (Video Added) | JRutledge | Basketball | 11 | Mon Apr 01, 2013 06:43am |
Purdue v. Michigan Backcourt violation | JRutledge | Basketball | 39 | Mon Jan 28, 2013 01:34am |