9-9-1 Backcourt - Editorial Revision?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Adam

Unless you look at the horrible reasoning given in the case play that states the throw-in play we keep talking about is not a violation.

Two different contexts.
Bob is commenting on a situation in which the ball is already inbounds and one team has had a player in control.
You are referencing a play ruling specific to throw-ins in which no control has been established inbounds.
Hence, the different rulings.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Two different contexts.
Bob is commenting on a situation in which the ball is already inbounds and one team has had a player in control.
You are referencing a play ruling specific to throw-ins in which no control has been established inbounds.
Hence, the different rulings.

I understand this, and I was being snarky. The fact is, the case play gives an incorrect reasoning for the play not being a violation.

They need to just fix the rule instead of relying on duct tape and WD-40.