NIT: Arkansas vs. California Blarge (Video)
 

I heard there was a Blarge in the cal ark game lastnight anyone see it or have video??

According to the play-by-play there were no double fouls called in the game.

I'm not sure, but I think the original call was PC, but then was changed to a block. I think maybe another official pointed out the defender was in the RA.

No blarge...in fact, no signals from anyone but the lead:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/P4Mbp5-qbsM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ok...by the new "upward motion" standard in NCAA-M, should this be a block? Or is it PC because of the initial contact being with the offensive player's leg/knee???

Upward motion block IMO

Agree...plus I believe at least one foot was still in the RA as well.

In HS, I'd probably have a block as well but it was close. I think the shooter was airborne while the defender's torso was still coming forward (not yet to the spot).

Albeit it unrelated I got a T for taunting............

I thought the same thing when I saw it on Top 10 plays, but now seeing it again I don't think he lingered there too long; he thought better of it.

Guess I will be calling the T's on our games again this summer !!!!!!;););)

See you in a few months !!!

I think this is a charge.

Until they clarify when actually they are in their upward motion, he does not gather the ball until his last step, I think the defender is there in time.

If it is that close, I am going charge until they clarify this more in the rules or by interpretation.

Peace

I'm with you on all that, however, the last clip makes me believe this is a RA play, which should be a block.

It was certainly very close. It looks like the left foot might be over the RA.

Now was this changed to a block or did the call stand?

Peace

Changed to a block. He shot free throws.

Well that is what is supposed to happen when the defender is in the RA and the secondary defender.

Peace