End of game review

[bob jenkins]

If it's still moving down, then it hasn't "remained in". I don't really see any conflict here.

[Rooster]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If it's still moving down, then it hasn't "remained in". I don't really see any conflict here.

Nor do I. But what I was originally asking is:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Yes -- it's when the "top" of the ball gets through the bottom of the net.

Where did you get this? Is it in a rule book somewhere or is it a common-sense interpretation? If it's part of a rule I'd like to know which one. If it's a common-sense interpretation, I agree with it.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Rooster

Nor do I. But what I was originally asking is:



Where did you get this? Is it in a rule book somewhere or is it a common-sense interpretation? If it's part of a rule I'd like to know which one. If it's a common-sense interpretation, I agree with it.

Common sense. If it is still going through, it hasn't passed through, yet.

The "remains" phrase is allowing for a net that has become tangled for whatever reason.

[Rooster]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Common sense. If it is still going through, it hasn't passed through, yet.

Kinda like a dribbler who has his head and shoulders past a defender and then makes contact with the defender's leg. Just being jerky...

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

The "remains" phrase is allowing for a net that has become tangled for whatever reason.

Yep, never had question about this one.