The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
FT flopping, then Flagrant Foul. FT flopping, then Flagrant Foul.
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:39pm
Registered User
  
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: DE
Posts: 226
I believe the ended up giving the player who did the pushing a FF1. I agree with that. I would have liked the C to be a little more active there either telling him to knock it off or giving information about what he saw immediately. A little acting but that is not anything close to a basketball play.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2014, 06:48pm
Back from the DL
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by walt View Post
I believe the ended up giving the player who did the pushing a FF1. I agree with that.
I'd only agree with that if they'd give the flopper a T, making it a double foul.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2014, 06:52pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
  
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
T the B player. That will stop all the nonsense that goes on. Then tell the A coach that acting isn't appreciated.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:59am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
T the B player. That will stop all the nonsense that goes on. Then tell the A coach that acting isn't appreciated.
Ball was live, couldn't have a T for that.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:44pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
  
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
Ball was live, couldn't have a T for that.
Yes, of course. In Fed, INT. In college, the right outcome occurred.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 12:17am
C'mon man!!
  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
I'd only agree with that if they'd give the flopper a T, making it a double foul.
Wouldn't you have a FF1 then a technical foul?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 12:48am
AremRed
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
There is a difference between flopping and exaggeration. This is exaggeration by the white jersey player. If the black jersey player does not want to be called for a flagrant foul then he should not be sticking his hand there.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:56pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
There is a difference between flopping and exaggeration. This is exaggeration by the white jersey player. If the black jersey player does not want to be called for a flagrant foul then he should not be sticking his hand there.
Flopping is faking being fouled. How is exaggeration not within that definition?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Flopping is faking being fouled. How is exaggeration not within that definition?
It is. Some just wan't to avoid the issue any way they can. If the defender does anything in an attempt to get you to believe there was a foul other than actually being fouled, they have faked a foul.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:46pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
It is. Some just wan't to avoid the issue any way they can. If the defender does anything in an attempt to get you to believe there was a foul other than actually being fouled, they have faked a foul.
Wouldn't go that far. A player can be legitimately fouled and still embellish the contact. To me, that doesn't meet the letter or the spirit of the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:12pm
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
It is. Some just wan't to avoid the issue any way they can. If the defender does anything in an attempt to get you to believe there was a foul other than actually being fouled, they have faked a foul.
How many T's have you called for this in your career?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:50pm
AremRed
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Flopping is faking being fouled. How is exaggeration not within that definition?
All flopping is exaggeration. Not all exaggeration is flopping.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
It is. Some just wan't to avoid the issue any way they can. If the defender does anything in an attempt to get you to believe there was a foul other than actually being fouled, they have faked a foul.
I don't think I'm trying to "avoid the issue any way I can".

Regarding the play in the OP: Was there a foul? Yes. Did the defender exaggerate and act like he was shot, which made it look like he was flopping? Yes. Does the defender deserve a technical foul for this? No.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:11pm
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
...
Regarding the play in the OP: Was there a foul? Yes. Did the defender exaggerate and act like he was shot, which made it look like he was flopping? Yes. Does the defender deserve a technical foul for this? No.
Correct, because is was live-ball contact, so he received a flagrant personal (FF1).
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 12:51am
We don't rent pigs
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
It's been stated here before but I don't recall. What determines what they can and can't review? I have a lane violation, before and after the review.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:48am
Courageous When Prudent
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
I'd only agree with that if they'd give the flopper a T, making it a double foul.
If the offensive player had not exaggerated, the defensive player would have gotten away with foul. The exaggeration is what led to the video review.

But the offensive player most definitely got fouled, so he wasn't faking..
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flagrant foul tref Basketball 2 Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:20pm
flagrant foul/flagrant technical splitveer Basketball 6 Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm
Flagrant foul? drmarcus Basketball 12 Tue Feb 24, 2009 09:08am
Is flopping a foul? womens_hoops Basketball 5 Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:29pm
Flagrant foul oc Basketball 8 Tue Dec 09, 2003 01:08am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02am.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1