Block/Charge thoughts (video)
As I watched this play two questions came to mind (I know, he's thinking again)...
1. Did the defender do anything wrong? 2. Do we default to "block" when we see a ball handler/dribbler/airborne shooter make contact that isn't directly on the defender's torso? <iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/EUd-eTekj6w?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
No and no.
|
Ouch. Defender did everything correctly and still gets penalized.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have a PC on this play. Last season on the NCAA-M's side, it was emphasized that contact does not have to be directly to the torso. |
Quote:
Not that the L can't make a call, but I see no problem with the L deferring to the C here. |
Quote:
That's why I'm asking #3. |
The L seems to still be getting to the end line. Could he feel he doesn't have a good enough look?
|
Quote:
|
This is a PC. At one of my camps last year the clinicians covered #2 and talked about how a lot of officials think (wrongly) that contact for a PC has to be center torso. They showed a bunch of clips similar to this one and the general consensus was practically all of them should have been PC but were called blocks. I also agree a double whistle would have been good here but it is C's primary.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you consider this a secondary defender, than in NCAA-M, the L gets first crack. |
Quote:
I don't think this is an odd numbered fast break situation. Looks like 2 on 2 to me. Therefore, I am not sure I would classify the defender as a secondary defender. I think the L did a poor job of getting back to the end line and is out of position/straight lined and didn't have a good look. It should be a PC foul. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59am. |