The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Marquette vs Villanova--Video Request (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/97110-marquette-vs-villanova-video-request.html)

johnny d Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 920005)
And then, if the L says he had LGP out of the RA and stepped back, the discussion is over because it would no longer be an RA play. (NOT saying the player did have LGP or that the lead thought so)

This might technically be true, but in reality it isn't going to happen that way. Once the C or T come in the lead is going to change the call 999/1000 times. It is assumed that the C or T are only coming when they are 100% positive that it was/wasn't an RA play. If there is any doubt, we do not come in with the information. If it turns out the C or T was wrong, they will be the one getting dinged by the evaluator/assignor.

Rich Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 920005)
And then, if the L says he had LGP out of the RA and stepped back, the discussion is over because it would no longer be an RA play. (NOT saying the player did have LGP or that the lead thought so)

Would never happen. If I'm coming to you, I'm 100% sure and you're changing it.

Just like a partner coming to me on an OOB call he thinks I missed. I'm changing it, I'm not going to argue with him on the floor.

JetMetFan Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 920027)
Would never happen. If I'm coming to you, I'm 100% sure and you're changing it.

Just like a partner coming to me on an OOB call he thinks I missed. I'm changing it, I'm not going to argue with him on the floor.

It's not an argument. I'm L and C comes to me and says "B1 was in the RA." If I say to the C, "I know but I have B1 establishing LGP outside of the RA and backing in" the discussion is over just as quickly as if I had accepted C's information and gone with it.

bob jenkins Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMetFan (Post 920031)
It's not an argument. I'm L and C comes to me and says "B1 was in the RA." If I say to the C, "I know but I have B1 establishing LGP outside of the RA and backing in" the discussion is over just as quickly as if I had accepted C's information and gone with it.

I agree with JetMet.

If I didn't see that the player was in the RA, then I change it. <-- happens 99% of the time

If I see that the player was in the RA, but I have some other reason for it being a charge (player established outside; offense led with foot or arm; play started in LDB (NCAAW only)), then I explain it briefly and stick with my call <-- happens 1% of the time.

Same as if the ball goes out on my line and you come to me saying it was tipped out top -- 99% of the time I change it, but if the ball was tipped again that you didn't see, I stick with my call.

maroonx Mon Jan 27, 2014 08:41pm

Was that the proper mechanic for PCF on that play? Looks like official was showboating.

Rich Mon Jan 27, 2014 09:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by maroonx (Post 920096)
Was that the proper mechanic for PCF on that play? Looks like official was showboating.

Really?

Really?

A Pennsylvania Coach Mon Jan 27, 2014 09:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by maroonx (Post 920096)
Was that the proper mechanic for PCF on that play? Looks like official was showboating.

If I have a call that wipes off the game-winning buzzer-beating score, you can bet I'm selling the heck out of it. Whether the mechanic is perfect is far less important than 1) does everyone know what you have? and 2) have you done what you can to make them believe you are right?

Rich Mon Jan 27, 2014 09:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Pennsylvania Coach (Post 920098)
If I have a call that wipes off the game-winning buzzer-beating score, you can bet I'm selling the heck out of it. Whether the mechanic is perfect is far less important than 1) does everyone know what you have? and 2) have you done what you can to make them believe you are right?

Exactly. Anyone who thinks that going fist / hand to the back of the head / point there would be BETTER is missing the big picture.

APG Mon Jan 27, 2014 09:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by maroonx (Post 920096)
Was that the proper mechanic for PCF on that play? Looks like official was showboating.

Curious...why do you think the official was showboating?

Toren Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:06pm

I have an RA block. But beyond that I'm not even pointing to the RA because this is a garden variety block. I do not have LGP before the start of the upward motion by the defender.

Block, count it.

deecee Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:11pm

Im surprised no one has had 3 traveling violations yet.

Rich Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 920103)
Im surprised no one has had 3 traveling violations yet.

Give it time.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1