Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
(Post 891719)
1. If you're making enough of a nuisance to get my attention in an AAU game, you risk getting tossed.
2. A site director who refused to toss you for any reason wouldn't be getting officials from my association for long. Especially if his reason is, "the fan had a point." In this case, I'm probably tossing you for approaching me after the game combined with making a nuisance of yourself during the game.
3. If the first thing I hear is a polite approach between games, I'll engage. I'll tell you what I saw, but I'm not getting into a discussion, though. I'll tell you what I saw and what the rule is, but that's all.
4. Your description is of traveling, but the refs may have seen it differently.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
(Post 891779)
Wow!
I don't participate in many conversations any more, but I like reading what everyone has to say.
Adam, you seem knowledgeable and reasonable most of the time, maybe I am not reading you correctly.
|
Possible, and quite possibly because I wasn't clear. :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
(Post 891779)
IF the OP made the comment in the way he actually stated during the game, it is on the official to stay professional and not engage fans. Just because someone makes a comment or asks a question does not mean that an official needs to pay attention to it. I would hardly call the initial comment as a nuisance.
|
Lots of "ifs" here, to be honest. Sure, it's on us to be professional, but the OP was clearly engaging with the intent of getting the officials' attention. Not just comments, but he wanted to make his point. Chances are there's more to the story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
(Post 891779)
Even in the AAU setting, just how are you going to eject someone without the backing of the gym supervisor. It is rare that these individuals will eject unless vulgar or confrontational in nature.
|
If I've had a fan rise to the level of getting my attention during the game with comments such as "that was a travel because...." (as opposed to, for example, "why wasn't that a travel"), and then proceeds to come talk to me after the game to tell me which calls I missed, it's very possible I'd request to have him removed. (I wouldn't do that in front of him, I'd simply talk to the site manager.)
If the site manager didn't comply, the assigner would be finding out before I even drove out of the parking lot. If the problem wasn't resolved to my satisfaction, I'd simply refuse to work those games. For the pay involved, it's not worth the headaches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
(Post 891779)
While I don't see a problem with trying to educate someone, once you open the door for a conversation, be professional. If a person does not want to accept your explanation, just end the conversation and move away. There are enough bad examples out there, don't become another one.
|
Agreed. If you do say anything, it should be polite. I should have noted earlier that the "snide remarks" mentioned by the OP should be avoided.
If fans are making comments that indicate a lack of rules knowledge, I'll laugh about it with my partner when we're out of earshot. Or, I'll just stand there and laugh, out loud, while watching the playing action. Or both. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
(Post 891779)
Lastly, you never know who you are talking to, what their intentions are by starting a conversation, they might even have someone filming you for their youtube page.
|
All the more reason not to engage. At all. Frankly, my standard response is to politely direct them to the site manager.