The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 09:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
I know, at least in the NBA, they aren't using superimposed clocks. Since the game clock is the first clock of importance when determining the end of the period in the NBA, they're using shots with the game clock in the view of the camera (followed by LED lights which is next on the list when determining end of period/shot clock period).
I agree that would be ideal. I have also worked games (in the broadcast truck) where the camera operator goofed and didn't include the clock in the shot. Then they go to the superimposed clock.

My point is simply they use the superimposed clock many times, why would it all of a sudden be considered "inaccurate" now? Just as a reminder, I'm not talking about the computer generated clock that is used through most of the game, but superimposing the "clock" camera over the "game" camera.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
I may have posted about this before, but I was at a game a few years ago when the clock/TV thing came into play. Missouri State was playing at St. Louis University in 2006. MSU was up 50-49 and SLU had the last possession. They took a shot with a couple seconds left, followed by a tip-in at the buzzer. The officials went to the monitor and ended up counting the basket. A day or two later, it came out that the TV broadcast that they used to watch the replays was off by 3/10 of a second, so the clock on the screen showed .3 on the clock when the ball was tipped. If you watch the video of it below, you can actually pause it at a certain frame and hear the horn start to go off and the ball isn't even touching the shooter's hand yet on the tip-in.

SLU vs Missouri State Basketball - YouTube

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamG View Post
I agree that would be ideal. I have also worked games (in the broadcast truck) where the camera operator goofed and didn't include the clock in the shot. Then they go to the superimposed clock.

My point is simply they use the superimposed clock many times, why would it all of a sudden be considered "inaccurate" now? Just as a reminder, I'm not talking about the computer generated clock that is used through most of the game, but superimposing the "clock" camera over the "game" camera.
There's a picture floating about from a game last year (or the year prior) where the clock above the basket showed 0.0 and the clock elsewhere in the arena showed 0.x

(I think this is (part of) what led to the slight rule change to require the use of the clock above the basket.)

So, if the superimposed clock is the one above the basket, no problem. If it's from elsewhere in the arena, ...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 10:34am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
There's a picture floating about from a game last year (or the year prior) where the clock above the basket showed 0.0 and the clock elsewhere in the arena showed 0.x

(I think this is (part of) what led to the slight rule change to require the use of the clock above the basket.)

So, if the superimposed clock is the one above the basket, no problem. If it's from elsewhere in the arena, ...
In fact there was a game this season (Gonzaga/Butler I think) where from one camera angle you see the 2 different times between the backboard clock and the arena clock.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 11:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
There's a picture floating about from a game last year (or the year prior) where the clock above the basket showed 0.0 and the clock elsewhere in the arena showed 0.x

(I think this is (part of) what led to the slight rule change to require the use of the clock above the basket.)

So, if the superimposed clock is the one above the basket, no problem. If it's from elsewhere in the arena, ...
Fair enough. I assume the officials go by the one above the basket?

I'll try to keep that in mind when doing future broadcasts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 06, 2013, 11:33am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamG View Post
Fair enough. I assume the officials go by the one above the basket?

I'll try to keep that in mind when doing future broadcasts.
In the NBA the game clock is the one on top of the backboard and takes first precedence. Next is the LED lights, then the clock on the facades, then the clock on the scoreboard from the ceiling, then tv superimposed clocks.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1